2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13072-020-00350-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of 3D genome organization, guided by cohesin and CTCF looping, on sex-biased chromatin interactions and gene expression in mouse liver

Abstract: Several thousand sex-differential distal enhancers have been identified in mouse liver; however, their links to sexbiased genes and the impact of any sex-differences in nuclear organization and chromatin interactions are unknown. To address these issues, we first characterized 1847 mouse liver genomic regions showing significant sex differential occupancy by cohesin and CTCF, two key 3D nuclear organizing factors. These sex-differential binding sites were primarily distal to sex-biased genes but rarely generat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(215 reference statements)
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STAT5 and downstream GH-dependent transcription factors bind to individual sites in liver chromatin in a sex-biased manner, resulting in sex-differences in liver transcription [30][31][32]. Sex differences are also evident in the liver epigenome, including extensive sex differences in open chromatin regions (DNase I hypersensitive sites; DHS) [33,34], chromatin marks [4,35,36], DNA methylation [37][38][39] and 3D genomic interactions and organization [40] associated with the transcription of sex-specific genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STAT5 and downstream GH-dependent transcription factors bind to individual sites in liver chromatin in a sex-biased manner, resulting in sex-differences in liver transcription [30][31][32]. Sex differences are also evident in the liver epigenome, including extensive sex differences in open chromatin regions (DNase I hypersensitive sites; DHS) [33,34], chromatin marks [4,35,36], DNA methylation [37][38][39] and 3D genomic interactions and organization [40] associated with the transcription of sex-specific genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This arrangement suggests the TAD is divided into 3 insulated regions in TCPOBOP-exposed liver, perhaps separated by intra-TAD loops ('sub-TADs') [ 57 ]. There is evidence for an intra-TAD loop in untreated female but not male liver [ 58 ] that encompasses the first 2 segments but excludes the third (Fig. 7 c, 4th track, red horizontal bar).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, a majority of the genes in the TCPOBOP-repressed middle segment are more highly responsive to TCPOBOP in female liver, where 4 of 5 genes show female-biased expression in vehicle-treated liver. This female-specific intra-TAD loop [ 58 ] could allow the strong induction of lnc15004 to lead to repression of these genes in TCPOBOP-treated female liver.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest level of expression was often seen in the chromatin fraction, which increased the sensitivity for lncRNA detection and helps explain why many of these regulated lncRNAs were not discovered in earlier whole liver or total nuclear RNA-seq analyses. Many of these sex-biased and TCPOBOPresponsive lncRNAs may be cis-acting, based on their location together with similarly regulated, or in some cases oppositely regulated PCGs within the same TADs, where most promoter-enhancer interactions, including lncRNA-PCG interactions, are expected to occur [49]. Overall, 25% of sexbiased lncRNAs were located in TADs with other sex-biased genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7C). Interestingly, there is evidence for an intra-TAD loop in untreated female but not male liver [49] that encompasses the first 2 segments, and excludes the third segment ( Fig. 7C, 4th track, red horizontal bar).…”
Section: Differential Enrichment Of Transcripts In Subcellular Fractimentioning
confidence: 98%