2013
DOI: 10.1590/0074-0276108022013013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a community-based bug-hunting campaign on Chagas disease control: a case study in the department of Jalapa, Guatemala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High variation in sensitivity of manual inspection has been recorded between previous studies. In contrast, the sensitivity of collection by householders remained high between studies (Gü rtler et al 1999, Esteban et al 2006, Parra et al 2006, Feliciangeli et al 2007, Abad-Franch et al 2011, Yoshioka 2013, indicating that inhabitants were motivated to improve their own situation, and hence a community-based program could be highly successful. In Venezuela, collection by householders identiÞed 99.2% of all the houses found to be positive, whereas the method with the second highest efÞcacy, manual inspection, identiÞed only 5.3% of the infested houses (Feliciangeli et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…High variation in sensitivity of manual inspection has been recorded between previous studies. In contrast, the sensitivity of collection by householders remained high between studies (Gü rtler et al 1999, Esteban et al 2006, Parra et al 2006, Feliciangeli et al 2007, Abad-Franch et al 2011, Yoshioka 2013, indicating that inhabitants were motivated to improve their own situation, and hence a community-based program could be highly successful. In Venezuela, collection by householders identiÞed 99.2% of all the houses found to be positive, whereas the method with the second highest efÞcacy, manual inspection, identiÞed only 5.3% of the infested houses (Feliciangeli et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Venezuela, collection by householders identiÞed 99.2% of all the houses found to be positive, whereas the method with the second highest efÞcacy, manual inspection, identiÞed only 5.3% of the infested houses (Feliciangeli et al 2007). In Guatemala, Þve-to sixfold more triatomines were collected by householders in 1 wk than traditional methods collect in 1 yr (Yoshioka 2013). As well as being highly sensitive, the former method promotes community involvement and has been found to be highly acceptable and cost effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of citizen-collected data presents unique challenges due to observer error and sampling bias [ 3 ]. For example, public submission programs result non-target bug species [ 32 , 33 ]; however this potential source of observer error is controlled for in our program by laboratory identification of all kissing bugs. The geographic breadth of submissions reflects the area over which citizens are aware of the program and able to contribute to it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community-based surveillance has been shown to be effective and cost-effective, but can be challenging to sustain [ 11 14 ]. Household infestation with vectors can be detected readily by inhabitants, and in turn, health services are expected to respond to every vector report by visiting houses to spray insecticide and provide educational advice [ 9 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%