2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3726-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a complementary/integrative medicine program on the need for supportive cancer care-related medications

Abstract: CIM treatments may reduce the need for NOAs among patients with breast or gynecological cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…TA true acupuncture; SA sham acupuncture; SC standard care for symptom control. In view of the growing consideration of acupuncture within the therapeutic armamentarium [54][55][56] for common systemic therapy related toxicities, and in recognition of the limited data [57] available in respect to radiation therapy, we sought to analyze the literature in the most rigorous way, aiming to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice in head and neck cancer. Following our prespecified search strategy, only a limited number of articles qualified for qualitative analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TA true acupuncture; SA sham acupuncture; SC standard care for symptom control. In view of the growing consideration of acupuncture within the therapeutic armamentarium [54][55][56] for common systemic therapy related toxicities, and in recognition of the limited data [57] available in respect to radiation therapy, we sought to analyze the literature in the most rigorous way, aiming to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice in head and neck cancer. Following our prespecified search strategy, only a limited number of articles qualified for qualitative analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La ascendente notoriedad que ha cobrado la MC se manifiesta por el impacto en la mejoría de los pacientes que acuden para su tratamiento. Diversos estudios aseguran que dicha afluencia se basa tanto en fenómenos sociales como terapéuticos, que se enmarcan en algunas tendencias que van desde una creciente insatisfacción junto con la pérdida de la confianza en la biomedicina tecnológicamente sofisticada (10,13,16) hasta un incremento en la demanda para controlar el costo de la salud (15) Shalom Sharabi et al, reportan que la medicina complementaria e integrativa podría reducir la necesidad de analgésicos no opioides entre los pacientes con cáncer de mama o cáncer ginecológico (17) . Zheng Z. et al, concluye que es seguro reducir la medicación con opioides en pacientes con dolor crónico, por el tamaño de la muestra no se puede confirmar si la electroacupuntura ofrece un beneficio adicional a la educación; esta terapia no farmacológica podría ser un complemento para disminuir la terapia con opioides en pacientes que están dispuestos a reducirlos (18) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Las causas más frecuentes de consulta en el servicio de MC de EsSalud son las poliartrosis, la dorsalgia, la ansiedad, la obesidad y la cefalea. La intervención en este servicio es de manera integral, donde la reforma de los hábitos del paciente es trascendente para el cuidado de su salud (17) . Como antecedente, en EsSalud se hicieron diversas encuestas de consumo de medicamentos a los pacientes dados de alta en MEC, estas encuestas constaban de cuatro preguntas básicas: 1) ¿No disminuyó el consumo de su medicación?…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…43 The additional cost of IO will therefore need to demonstrate financial savings in other ways, for example, by improving adherence to life-saving cancer treatment and reducing the overall burden of disease. [44][45][46] Finally, while a lack of evidence is commonly cited as a reason not to provide or fund IO, 47,48 the findings suggest that building the evidence-base is only one part of the solution. These findings are in line with other non-IO health services research that recognizes the complexities of cultural biases, pragmatic constraints, and the political and organizational realities of decision-makers that combined, often have a greater influence than scientific evidence in ''real-world'' health care priority setting and funding decisions.…”
Section: Australian Integrative Oncology Services S-95mentioning
confidence: 99%