2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcle.2020.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a comprehensive functional rehabilitation programme on the quality of life of the oncological patient with dyspnoea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All individuals showed statistically significant improvements after the implementation of the proposed functional rehabilitation program. This is clearly corroborated by the results of similar studies in other incapacitating pathologies such as COPD or dyspnea [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All individuals showed statistically significant improvements after the implementation of the proposed functional rehabilitation program. This is clearly corroborated by the results of similar studies in other incapacitating pathologies such as COPD or dyspnea [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Twenty-five subjects were necessary in first group and twenty-five in the second to recognize as statistically significant a difference greater than or equal to 7.5 units in the Barthel Index score, which was considered as a primary variable. The common standard deviation was assumed to be 8.3 units [ 22 , 23 ] and a drop-out rate of 20% was anticipated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All individuals showed statistically signi cant improvements after the implementation of the proposed functional rehabilitation program. This is clearly corroborated by the results of similar studies in other incapacitating pathologies such as COPD or dyspnea [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Sample size: The sample size was estimated using the program EPIDAT 4.2, accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test, 25 subjects were necessary in rst group and 25 in the second to recognize as statistically signi cant a difference greater than or equal to 7.5 units in the Barthel Index score, which was considered as primary variable. The common standard deviation is assumed to be 8.3 units [22,23], and It was been anticipated a drop-out rate of 20%.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its high mortality and increasing incidence [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], it represents the first cause of death in men and the second in women [ 4 , 5 ]. Cancer affects the medical aspects of the patient, but also generates a series of psychological, social, occupational, family and emotional conflicts in the lives of patients and their families [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. The patient, during the oncological process, faces physical limitations and problems of autonomy caused by the disease, adaptation to new family dynamics and care roles in the patient, deteriorated labour relations and work incapacity, reduction of income at home, need for adaptations in the home, acquisition of orthopaedic material and complex emotional situations, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%