2013
DOI: 10.1029/2012jc007990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a new anisotropic rheology on simulations of Arctic sea ice

Abstract: [1] A new rheology that explicitly accounts for the subcontinuum anisotropy of the sea ice cover is implemented into the Los Alamos sea ice model. This is in contrast to all models of sea ice included in global circulation models that use an isotropic rheology. The model contains one new prognostic variable, the local structure tensor, which quantifies the degree of anisotropy of the sea ice, and two parameters that set the time scale of the evolution of this tensor. The anisotropic rheology provides a subcont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, promising advances in the parametrization of form drag (Tsamados et al, 2014) of air-ice, sea-ice and rheology (Tsamados et al, 2013) need to be implemented and tested, although for the latter it is not clear how beneficial this new rheology can be at high resolution -which is true of any existing rheology for that matter. The two latter advances are already available in CICE5 (Turner and Hunke, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, promising advances in the parametrization of form drag (Tsamados et al, 2014) of air-ice, sea-ice and rheology (Tsamados et al, 2013) need to be implemented and tested, although for the latter it is not clear how beneficial this new rheology can be at high resolution -which is true of any existing rheology for that matter. The two latter advances are already available in CICE5 (Turner and Hunke, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemieux et al, 2010;Kimmritz et al, 2015), different rheologies (e.g. Tremblay and Mysak, 1997;Hopkins, 2004;Schreyer et al, 2006;Wilchinsky and Feltham, 2006;Sulsky et al, 2007;Girard et al, 2011;Tsamados et al, 2013;Herman, 2016;Rabatel et al, 2015;Dansereau et al, 2016), and wind and/or ocean drag parameterisations (e.g. Lu et al, 2011;Lüpkes et al, 2012;Tsamados et al, 2014).…”
Section: P Rampal Et Al: Nextsim: a New Lagrangian Sea Ice Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all model runs, we choose the elastic-anisotropic-plastic rheology described in Tsamados et al [31]. This rheology is the default choice in our developmental branch of CICE and was shown to result in large regional differences in ice thickness with respect to the default elastic-viscousplastic rheology of Hunke & Dukowicz [32].…”
Section: Processes Controlling Ice Melt In a Sea Ice Model (A) Choicementioning
confidence: 99%