2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a New Portable Air Purification Technology Device in the Pediatric Hospital Setting – A Pre-post Assessment Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 562 patients diagnosed with infectious or noninfectious respiratory distress were included in this study in pre- and post-cohorts. Results showed that the rate of using invasive patient ventilation (i.e., intubation) was reduced 30%, and the average hospitalization time declined from 0.7 days to 0.4 days upon placing the portable air purifier in the rooms, though these differences did not achieve statistical significance. Further, clinical details were not provided to allow a better understanding of potential differences in specific clinical outcomes such as healthcare associated pneumonias, so it is difficult to understand these changes.…”
Section: Filtration In Healthcare Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A total of 562 patients diagnosed with infectious or noninfectious respiratory distress were included in this study in pre- and post-cohorts. Results showed that the rate of using invasive patient ventilation (i.e., intubation) was reduced 30%, and the average hospitalization time declined from 0.7 days to 0.4 days upon placing the portable air purifier in the rooms, though these differences did not achieve statistical significance. Further, clinical details were not provided to allow a better understanding of potential differences in specific clinical outcomes such as healthcare associated pneumonias, so it is difficult to understand these changes.…”
Section: Filtration In Healthcare Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Out of the 24 studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria [ [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] ], 17 studies were conducted and published between 2020 and 2022 during the COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only one study described the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in air samples collected in addition to other airborne microbes (a range of other bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They need approximately 45,000 patients to attain a power of 80% 60 months Results are not published yet. Arikan et al, 2021 [ 19 ] Decreased rate of hospital-acquired infections in ICUs in a hospital Non-randomised prospective study 8 months Significant positive correlation with the decreased rate of hospital-acquired infections Rao et al, 2020 [ 31 ] Improvement of health outcomes for patients admitted with respiratory distress in the paediatric hospital setting Non-randomised prospective study of 562 patients 3 months Non-significant association with the decreased overall length of stay in the hospital and ICU, intubation, nebuliser, and non-invasive ventilation use . However, the authors reported that these reductions were clinically meaningful with a significant impact on the healthcare system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 8 , 9 In terms of expressing measured efficacy, some authors have used disease incidence or frequency of disease symptoms in a setting as a measurement method. 10 , 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%