2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Acoustic Noise Reduction on Patient Experience in Routine Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acoustic noise represents an important hazard in MRI, primarily due to its potential impact on patient compliance. Several studies have attempted to assess the impact of ANR algorithms on image quality by performing quantitative and qualitative analyses on patient images across a range of eld strengths, algorithms, pulse sequences, and anatomical regions [5][6][7][8][9]. We have quantitatively assessed four image quality metrics on a commonly available QA phantom via scripts written on freely available software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Acoustic noise represents an important hazard in MRI, primarily due to its potential impact on patient compliance. Several studies have attempted to assess the impact of ANR algorithms on image quality by performing quantitative and qualitative analyses on patient images across a range of eld strengths, algorithms, pulse sequences, and anatomical regions [5][6][7][8][9]. We have quantitatively assessed four image quality metrics on a commonly available QA phantom via scripts written on freely available software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major MRI manufacturers have developed proprietary ANR software options that utilise gradient waveform manipulation. Previous studies have aimed to assess the impact of ANR reduction algorithms or hardware on image quality and/or acoustic noise levels [5][6][7][8][9]. The image quality assessments of these studies have been performed on patient images and either scored using manually placed ROIs or qualitatively by Radiologists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Room temperature maintenance and the use of ear protection such as ear plugs and headphones, to reduce the effects of the MRI-related acoustic noise [41] are vital to ensure a successful MRI examination. Acoustic noise can often be one of the most distressing factors for patients during clinical examinations [43] .…”
Section: Communication and Patient Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic noise produced by the MRI scanner can reach levels up to 130 dB, 2 making it a necessity to wear hearing protection, and can be a major source of discomfort and distress especially for vulnerable patient populations. 3,4 Motion artifacts on the other hand are problematic in all medical imaging techniques, but especially in MRI using high resolution and long scan times. From a clinical perspective, motion artifacts can obscure pathology, requiring re-acquisition of the scans and thus imposing additional costs to the hospital and extra burden for the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic noise produced by the MRI scanner can reach levels up to 130 dB, 2 making it a necessity to wear hearing protection, and can be a major source of discomfort and distress especially for vulnerable patient populations 3,4 . Motion artifacts on the other hand are problematic in all medical imaging techniques, but especially in MRI using high resolution and long scan times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%