2014
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Age and Baseline NIHSS Scores on Clinical Outcomes in the Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Solitaire FR in Acute Ischemic Stroke Study

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Age and stroke severity are inversely correlated with the odds of favorable outcome after ischemic stroke. A previously proposed score for Stroke Prognostication Using Age and NIHSS Stroke Scale (SPAN) indicated that SPAN-100-positive patients (ie, age ϩ NIHSS score ϭ 100 or more) do not benefit from IV-tPA. If this finding holds true for endovascular therapy, this score can impact patient selection for such interventions. This study investigated whether a score combining age and NIHSS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,24,25 Furthermore, previous analysis of the STAR registry by using stratification by the Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIH Stroke Scale (SPAN) demonstrated poorer outcomes in patients with SPAN-100-positive scores, that is, patients with AIS in whom age ϩ presentation NIHSS were Ͼ100. 26 Of note, the baseline NIHSS score did not differ significantly between the older and younger groups in our study or indeed in the other studies comparing outcomes between the 2 age groups. This finding confirms the expectation that poorer outcomes are expected in older age groups unless good reperfusion is achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…21,24,25 Furthermore, previous analysis of the STAR registry by using stratification by the Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIH Stroke Scale (SPAN) demonstrated poorer outcomes in patients with SPAN-100-positive scores, that is, patients with AIS in whom age ϩ presentation NIHSS were Ͼ100. 26 Of note, the baseline NIHSS score did not differ significantly between the older and younger groups in our study or indeed in the other studies comparing outcomes between the 2 age groups. This finding confirms the expectation that poorer outcomes are expected in older age groups unless good reperfusion is achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…8) However, in acute phase revascularization, the complication and mortality rates have been reported to be higher in older patients, and old age is considered an independent poor prognostic factor. 6,9,10) In this study, the percentage of patients in whom recanalization could be achieved with a single device, procedural time, and recanalization rate were all comparable between the older and control groups. While the time until placement of the guiding catheter was also comparable, the percentage of patients who required change of the approach difference was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, the analysis period was restricted to 2008-2010, the type of device used was not mentioned and treatment effect could not be assessed. 22 Almekhlafi et al 23 used the SPAN-100 index (i.e. positive index if age þ NIHSS score ¼ 100 or more) and found lower proportions of favorable outcome in the patients with positive (61%) compared to negative SPAN index (27%, OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.9), with 60% of positive SPAN index being 80 years of age and older.…”
Section: Aspects To Be Considered In Mechanical Thrombectomymentioning
confidence: 99%