Impact of agronomic practices on grape aroma composition: a review

Abstract

Aroma compounds are secondary metabolites that play a key role in grape quality for enological purposes. Terpenes, C -norisoprenoids, phenols, and non-terpenic alcohols are the most important aroma compounds in grapes and they can be found as free volatiles or glycoconjugated (bound) molecules. The non-volatile glycosylated group is the largest, and it is present in all varieties of Vitis vinifera (L.), the most widely used species for wine production. These aroma precursors represent the reserve of aroma molecules that can be released during winemaking. Their relative and absolute concentrations at fruit ripening determine the organoleptic value of the final product. A large range of biotic and abiotic factors can influence their biosynthesis in several ways. Agronomic practices such as irrigation, training systems, leaf removal, and bunch thinning can have an effect at plant level. The spraying of stimulatory compounds on fruit at different developmental stages has also been shown to modify metabolic pathways at fruit level with some impact on the aroma composition of the grapevine fruit. Viticulturists could act to promote aroma precursors to improve the aromatic profile of grapes and the wine ultimately produced. However, agronomic practices do not always have uniform results. The metabolic and physiological changes resulting from agronomic practices are unknown because there has not been sufficient research to date. This review presents the state of the art regarding the influences of vineyard agronomic management on the biosynthesis of grape aroma compounds. Although literature regarding the topic is abundant there are still many unknown biological mechanisms involved and/or that have been insufficiently studied. The aim of this work is therefore to find the gaps in scientific literature so that future investigations can focus on them. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

The Microvine: A Versatile Plant Model to Boost Grapevine Studies in Physiology and Genetics

“…Fifty grape sampling time points spreading to 86 days were established and normalized using the cumulative growing degree days parameter. The results confirmed that vine-shoot extract treatment had a positive impact on the accumulation of glycosylated compounds [45], especially aglycones such as alcohols, terpenes, and C13-norisoprenoids, with a higher impact when the treatment was applied at grape ripening stage.…”

Impact of crop load on nitrogen uptake and reserve mobilisation in Vitis vinifera

“…Introduction Fruit composition, though partly determined by genotype and uncontrolled environmental conditions, can be managed to some extent through the optimisation of agricultural practices, such as vineyard floor management, fertilisation, canopy management and crop thinning, before and during fruit development (Masclaux-Daubresse et al 2010;Sweetman et al 2014;Alem et al 2019). The effect of crop load on C assimilation and partitioning has been extensively studied (Chaves 1984;Morinaga et al 2003;Dai et al 2010).…”

Review of water deficit mediated changes in vine and berry physiology; Consequences for the optimization of irrigation strategies

“…The effects of water deficit on flavor and aroma potential are less evident than for phenolic compounds derived from the phenylpropanoid pathway. Depending on the type of aroma precursor, water availability can have various effects as reviewed by Alem et al (2019). Moreover, as for phenylpropanoids it is often difficult to deduce physiological effects of water deficit because most papers present results on a concentration basis without berry weight or volume data, thus concentration effects due to berry volume changes preclude a physiological interpretation.…”