2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of an electronic decision support rule on ESR/CRP co-ordering rates in a community health system and projected impact in the tertiary care setting and a commercially insured population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coupled with the lack of diagnostic accuracy, CRP should be ordered instead of ESR in routine practice, and CRP and ESR should not be ordered together. 30…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled with the lack of diagnostic accuracy, CRP should be ordered instead of ESR in routine practice, and CRP and ESR should not be ordered together. 30…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Juskewitch et al [ 16 ] implemented an alert, triggered by the concomitant order of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in a community health system. Again, the user is informed about the inappropriate request and has the choice to cancel ESR or to proceed with the order.…”
Section: Possible Strategies To Avoid Inappropriate Test Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a minority of surveyed clinicians stated that cost information frequently influenced their decisions. In general, cost control is endorsed by clinicians, but reductions in expenditure may be also achieved by implementing DM strategies, which combat overutilization [ 14 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Possible Strategies To Avoid Inappropriate Test Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation