2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of an emergency medicine pharmacist on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The median DTN administration times with a pharmacist present group was similar, at 47 minutes, compared with previously reported times of 46‐69.5 minutes . In the ED pharmacist not present group, times were similar to previous studies, with a median administration time of 60 minutes compared with 58‐89.5 minutes .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The median DTN administration times with a pharmacist present group was similar, at 47 minutes, compared with previously reported times of 46‐69.5 minutes . In the ED pharmacist not present group, times were similar to previous studies, with a median administration time of 60 minutes compared with 58‐89.5 minutes .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…What remains to be seen is whether any clinical outcomes may be affected with the utilization of a pharmacist on the stroke team, which could be answered with larger randomized controlled trials designed to address these functional outcomes. This study adds to the paucity of literature which shows the association of having a pharmacist implemented into the stroke team and a reduction of DTN administration times, and with some data suggesting that faster administration of rTPA leads to better functional outcomes . What also remains to be addressed is the potential financial implications of adding a pharmacist into stroke teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we were unable to conduct a home visit or face‐to‐face interview for patients discharged directly from ED, relying instead on telephone interviews, we may have under‐estimated the prevalence of MRPs. Although some authors have suggested roles for ED pharmacists in minimising time to administer critical medications, such as thrombolysis in stroke, our study did not include such delays as MRPs, because we were unable to systematically identify these delays, with our methodology. Similarly, our methodology has likely under‐estimated the prevalence of administration and dispensing errors, due to difficulties in identifying these errors after the ED presentation if they were not identified and documented during the presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%