2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of an emissions trading scheme on Australian households: A computable general equilibrium analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found the 3E approach was better than the ancestral approach in some respects in the case of Guangdong province. Tran et al [6] analyzed the relationship between an emissions trading scheme and various revenue recycling options using the case of Australian households. Results showed that Australia’s real GDP contracted slightly because of emission permit prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found the 3E approach was better than the ancestral approach in some respects in the case of Guangdong province. Tran et al [6] analyzed the relationship between an emissions trading scheme and various revenue recycling options using the case of Australian households. Results showed that Australia’s real GDP contracted slightly because of emission permit prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates, that poorer households will have a higher propensity to reduce their emissions than richer as the carbon price will constitute a higher share of their budget. On the other hand, the results demonstrate that redistributing the revenues from carbon certificates in the same proportion that payments from government to households are made today to various income quintiles can work as a tool to decrease income inequality, as shown in references [15,17], because the poorer households derive a higher share of their income from government payments and would, therefore, observe higher gross income growth than richer households.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In terms of administrative costs, they posit that a targeted approach would be more efficient as it would be conducted through the existing welfare system channels, while a lump-sum transfer to all households would require the establishment of a new channel to disburse the funds. Work by Tran et al [17] analyzed the impact of emission reduction in Australia by 2020 by using a static CGE model. Without revenue compensating mechanisms, they find a decline in Australia's GDP by 0.285%-0.3% by 2020 as well as a decrease in welfare for all 20 household categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It describes sectoral interactions in the economy and can simulate the impacts and feedback from energy and environmental policy shocks on energy, the economy, and the environment. Therefore, it is widely used in energy and environmental policy evaluation (Pui and Othman, 2017;Li et al, 2018;Tran et al, 2019). As a top-down macro-model, CGE has the advantage of simulating the impact of policy on macroeconomic activities, but it has difficulty describing microcharacteristics in energy, emissions reduction technology, cost, and so on.…”
Section: Resource Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%