Impact of analyzing fewer image frames per segment during offline volumetric radiofrequency-based intravascular ultrasound measurements of target lesions prior to percutaneous coronary interventions

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the impact of a 50% reduction in number of image frames (every second frame) on the analysis time and variability of offline volumetric radiofrequency-based intravascular ultrasound (RF-IVUS) measurements in target lesions prior to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Volumetric RF-IVUS data of vessel geometry and plaque composition are generally obtained by a semi-automated analysis process that includes time-consuming manual contour editing. A reduction in the number of frames used for volumetric analysis may speed up the analysis, but could increase measurement variability. We repeatedly performed offline volumetric analyses in RF-IVUS image sets of 20 mm-long coronary segments that contained 30 de novo lesions prior to PCI. A 50% reduction in frames decreased the analysis time significantly (from 57.5 ± 7.3 to 35.7 ± 3.7 min; P < 0.0001) while geometric and compositional RF-IVUS measurements did not differ significantly from measurements obtained from all frames. The variability between measurements on the reduced number of frames versus all frames was comparable to the intra-observer measurement variability. In target lesions prior to PCI, offline volumetric RF-IVUS analyses can be performed using a reduced number of image frames (every second frame). This reduces the time of analysis without substantially increasing measurement variability.

Reproducibility of Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography for Lumen and Length Measurements in Humans (The CLI-VAR [Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-VARiability] Study)

“…17,18 Additional studies are required to reliably establish the reproducibility of FD-OCT in these other settings. Finally, although the reproducibility of intravascular ultrasonography for area and length measurements is similar to that of FD-OCT, 19 the superior spatial resolution of the latter clearly favors it whenever accurate intracoronary imaging is required, unless the vessel wall also needs to be explored thoroughly.…”