2012
DOI: 10.1186/1687-1499-2012-261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of antenna correlation on the performance of partial relay selection

Abstract: Antenna correlation is generally viewed as an obstacle to realize the desired performance of a wireless system. In this article, we investigate the performance of partial relay selection in the presence of antenna correlation. We consider both channel state information (csi)-assisted and fixed gain amplify-and-forward (AF) relay schemes. The source and the destination are equipped with multiple antennas communicating via the best first hop signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) relay. We derived the closed form expressio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, partial relay selection either by selecting the maximum SNR of the firsthop [1] or second-hop [3]. In [4], the partial relay selection with beamforming in correlated antennas over Rayleigh fading is considered with single antenna relay nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, partial relay selection either by selecting the maximum SNR of the firsthop [1] or second-hop [3]. In [4], the partial relay selection with beamforming in correlated antennas over Rayleigh fading is considered with single antenna relay nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N relays are considered to be in a cluster, so that they are assumed to be at approximately the same position. The simplifying assumption that the relays are organized within a cluster is commonly utilized in the literature and can represent a number of practical scenarios (please see, for instance, [16][17][18][19][20]). The channel between any transmitter i and receiver j is denoted by h ij and follows a Nakagami-m distribution [21] with fading parameter m ij and average power λ ij .…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%