Impact of areawide integrated pest management strategies on pests of pigeonpea and yield in Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India

Bhede, B.V.; Sharma, O. P.; Badgujar, A.G.; Bhagat, Someshwar; Bhosle, B. B.; Khullar, Mukesh

doi:10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00017.x

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The management of pod borer complex in pigeonpea is highly dependent on large number of chemical insecticides including recently approved new chemistry group molecules such as chlorantraniliprole (18.5% SC), flubendiamide (39.35% SC), indoxacarb (15.8% EC) and emamectin benzoate (5% SG) and proved quite effective insecticides against pod borer (Sharma et al, 2018;Srinivasan and Sridhar, 2008;Babriya et al, 2010;Bhede et al, 2015). Profenofos is an organophosphorus insecticide, chemically called as O-4-bromo-2-chlorophenyl O-ethyl Spropyl phosphorothioate (IUPAC) and O-(4-bromo-2-chlorophenyl) O-ethyl Spropyl phosphorothioate (CAS).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of Profenofos Residues using LC-MS/MS and Its Dissipation Kinetics in Pigeonpea Pods

Naik

Chawan

Pallavi

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Pigeonpea is a drought resistant legume crop, cultivated in semiarid tropical and subtropical regions of the world mainly for its protein enriched seeds. Insect pests are major biotic constraints implicating yield losses of staggering dimensions. Profenofos is being used for management of pigeonpea pod borer and studying the pattern of dissipation, residual occurrence and hazard index for consumption of pigeonpea grain contaminated with profenofos is very important. Methods: A simple, sensitive and reproducible method for analysis of profenofos in pigeonpea green pods and dry grain was standardized and validated using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with electro spray ionization (ESI+). Modified QuEChERS methods with 1 % ethyl acetate in acetonitrile involved in the extraction of profenofos residues from green pods and mature dry grains. Results: The limit of detection and limit of quantification (LOD and LOQ) were 0.002 and 0.006 µgg-1, respectively. The recovery ranges from 88.75 to 101.36 % for the green pods and 88.34 to 98.77 % for mature dry grains with relative standard deviation (RSD) was in the range of 0.99 to 4.05 %. The field study was conducted to investigate the dissipation kinetics of profenofos in pigeonpea. Two applications of profenofos 50 % EC at 500 and 1000 g a.i.ha-1 at 15 days intervals in pigeonpea at the time of pod formation recorded initial deposits of 20.28 and 41.64 ìgg-1 in the green pod, respectively. At15 days after application, residues gradually dissipated to the level of 0.78 and 1.98 µg g-1 accounting to the loss of 96.15 and 95.58 % at 500 and 1000 g a.i. ha-1, respectively. The half-life values were 5.18 and 5.93 days. Hazard index (HI) was found less than 1 at 25th and 35th day after application at 500 and 1000 g a. i. ha-1, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of Profenofos Residues using LC-MS/MS and Its Dissipation Kinetics in Pigeonpea Pods

Naik

Chawan

Pallavi

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Evaluation of IPM module on bases of percent pod damage in Pigeonpea (Kharif, 2014(Kharif, -2015. Bhede et al (2015) who reported mean number of webbings by larvae was less in IPM (0.09/ plant) as compared to Non IPM fields (0.16/ plant) in pigeon pea. For jassids, minimum mean population (6.00 jassids/plant) was recorded in IPM as compared with non IPM module in which 13.00 mean population was recorded.…”

Section: Introucationmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Results showed that insect pests of pigeonpea were effectively managed by IPM practices over non-IPM. Hence, the IPM program successfully served as an effective way to replace the traditional use of insecticides being used earlier in pigeon pea (Chandrakar and Shrivastava 2002, Mittal and Ujagir 2005, Meena et al 2006, Srinivasan and Durairaj, 2007, Dodia et al 2009, Sharma et al 2015 and in chickpea crop (Singh et al 2009 …”

Section: Introucationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of integrated pest management module against insect pests of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan in Tarai region of Uttarakhand

Maurya

Agnihotri

Tiwari

et al. 2017

JANS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

./ha). The results indicated that minimum population of pod borers (Helicoverpa armigera, Maruca vitrata and podfly) and sucking insects (aphids, jassids, pod bug) was reported in IPM plots and maximum population of insects was observed in Non-IPM plots. Percent insect control over non-IPM was 50.98 % for H. armigera, 44.69 % for M. vitrata and 19.17 % for Maruca webbing were recorded. While, for sucking pest complex, insect control over non-IPM was 51.59 %, 40.36 % and 36.17 % against jassids, aphids and tur pod bug, respectively. Similarly, minimum pod borer damage (6.48 and 7.71 %) was recorded in IPM plots as compared to maximum pod borer damage (8.37 and 8.22 %) in non -IPM plots, respectively during 2014 and 2015. Whereas, pooled grain yield for IPM plots was 1286.5 kg/ha for both seasons as against 888 kg/ha in non-IPM plots with 1:2.89 benefit cost ratio. Hence, It is apparent that studied IPM module was able to increase the yield of pigeonepea with lower cost of production as against non-IPM thus it would be benefiting the farmers.

show abstract

“…Component research has led to identification of mitigation measures against, e.g. low levels of host plant resistance, which can be compensated through judicious use of pesticides through community approach (Bhede et al 2015). Available resistance resources are effective in minimizing Fusarium wilt with limited success in Phytopthora and sterility mosaic disease due to their epidemiology.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation and implementation of principles of the Integrated Pest Management concept - sustainability and current challenges in pest endemic pulse bowl of India

Sharma

RACHAPPA²,

YELSHETTY³

et al. 2023

Indian J Agri Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insect pests and vascular diseases are the major constraints to pigeonpea production in Karnataka and primarily responsible for lower productivity. There is no substantial host plant resistance to key insect pests in currently adopted cultivars, however effective utilization of other components of pest management led to development of various integrated pest management (IPM) to minimize yield losses and protect the environment. In present studies, it is a total “system approach” to sustainable pest management involving seed treatment with microbials, synchronized sowing, modification in landscape and application of need-based pesticide spray. Spray schedule was combined with online pest monitoring system for the plant protection related advisories for the target region. The resultant IPM package implemented through farmer-managed operational scale plots and compared with non-IPM (normal farmer practices) across 7 taluks of Gulbarga district for 4 years (2010–2013 seasons). A total of 2197 farmer-managed demonstrations were conducted, giving a 5–104% yield advantage (district means) of IPM over farmers’ practice. Pest incidence data in IPM vis-à-vis non-IPM clearly indicates that pest can be managed by adopting IPM technology. Number of spray of pesticides could be reduced from 6 to 4. Pesticide residue analysis for 102 chemical pesticides for representative soil, water and grain samples drawn from IPM as well as non-IPM (farmers’ practice) fields, indicates their presence within the prescribed limits. Grain yields in IPM plots were generally 15–20% higher than in FP. Even with all the available inputs, the production is subject to residual production risk due to abiotic constraints (rainfall), diseases and insect pests, which often large farmers are able to bear. Here in present studies it has been clearly demonstrated that strategies are friendly and adoptable by the small and marginal farmers. Effective implementation of IPM practices by participating farmers demonstrated that remunerative and reliable yields could be obtained in this pest-prone environment and helps mitigate climate induced threat to agricultural development having relevance to other pigeonpea growing regions prone to similar pest pests.

show abstract

Impact of areawide integrated pest management strategies on pests of pigeonpea and yield in Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Determination of Profenofos Residues using LC-MS/MS and Its Dissipation Kinetics in Pigeonpea Pods

Determination of Profenofos Residues using LC-MS/MS and Its Dissipation Kinetics in Pigeonpea Pods

Validation of integrated pest management module against insect pests of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan in Tarai region of Uttarakhand

Validation and implementation of principles of the Integrated Pest Management concept - sustainability and current challenges in pest endemic pulse bowl of India

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About