2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-016-0181-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of atmospheric dust emission schemes on dust production and concentration over the Arabian Peninsula

Abstract: This study examines the impact of two of the most advanced dust emission schemes on the predictions of the weather research and forecasting model with chemistry (WRF-Chem) over the Middle East during a summer time period. Results show significant differences between the two simulations in the spatial distribution of dust emissions as well as in their size-resolved mass discretization. The AFWA scheme simulation predicts 30 % higher dust emission fluxes than the S11 module over the Arabian Peninsula (6.7 lg m -… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary comparison between the DUST-GOCART/AFWA and the DUSTUOC-Shao (2001) (S01) schemes is discussed in Rizza et al (2016), showing that the GOCART/AFWA emission scheme produces an important over-prediction of the dust concentration. This is also in agreement with recent findings by Fountoukis et al (2016). This may in part be explained by the fact that the AFWA scheme considers vertical dust flux only related to the clay content, while the S01 scheme considers a more realistic soil texture type.…”
Section: Dust Emission Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A preliminary comparison between the DUST-GOCART/AFWA and the DUSTUOC-Shao (2001) (S01) schemes is discussed in Rizza et al (2016), showing that the GOCART/AFWA emission scheme produces an important over-prediction of the dust concentration. This is also in agreement with recent findings by Fountoukis et al (2016). This may in part be explained by the fact that the AFWA scheme considers vertical dust flux only related to the clay content, while the S01 scheme considers a more realistic soil texture type.…”
Section: Dust Emission Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For the first time, a method for UVI forecasting has been developed for the dust-rich conditions of the Middle East that makes use of a three dimensional regional meteorology-chemistry model [7], [22] combined with surface solar radiation measurements from our monitoring stations in Doha, Qatar and NASA's OMI Aura satellite-retrieved data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, an alternative dust emission scheme option was developed to augment the WRF-Chem GOCART code. Several journal articles briefly discuss the use of the AER and AFWA modifications (e.g., Su and Fung, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Teixeira et al, 2016;Rizza et al, 2016;Fountoukis et al, 2016;Flaounas et al, 2016;Uzan et al, 2016;Nabavi, 2017;Cremades et al, 2017), but full documentation of the AFWA scheme has not yet been published. The purpose of this publication is therefore to document for the broader modeling community the alternate dust emission scheme (hereafter referred to as the AFWA scheme), its intended use, and how it compares with the other available dust emission schemes included in WRF-Chem GOCART.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%