2020
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1822307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of bad outputs and environmental regulation on efficiency of Indian leather firms: a directional distance function approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results support the previous literature on efficiency measurement that there is significant scope of reducing inputs like energy and material consumption in the leather industry (Bhandari, 2012; Bhandari and Maiti, 2012; Gupta et al , 2019). Studies have attributed inefficient use of resources in leather industry (like increased material consumption) to lack of research and development of indigenous technology, use of conventional technologies and inadequate emphasis on human skill development (Schjolden, 2000; Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, 2012; Singh and Gundimeda, 2021). Central Pollution Control Board (2019) elaborates on techniques to reduce water and energy use, recovery of chemicals and residue management, adoption of cleaner technologies and other sustainable practices to help firms achieve the potential input savings.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results support the previous literature on efficiency measurement that there is significant scope of reducing inputs like energy and material consumption in the leather industry (Bhandari, 2012; Bhandari and Maiti, 2012; Gupta et al , 2019). Studies have attributed inefficient use of resources in leather industry (like increased material consumption) to lack of research and development of indigenous technology, use of conventional technologies and inadequate emphasis on human skill development (Schjolden, 2000; Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, 2012; Singh and Gundimeda, 2021). Central Pollution Control Board (2019) elaborates on techniques to reduce water and energy use, recovery of chemicals and residue management, adoption of cleaner technologies and other sustainable practices to help firms achieve the potential input savings.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (2020) used a meta-frontier nonradial DDF approach to measure the static and dynamic CO2 emission performance of 16 port enterprises in China covering the years of 2013 to 2018. Singh and Gundimeda (2021) measured the environmental efficiency of the grossly polluting Indian leather industry using DDF method under three directional vectors.…”
Section: Environmental Efficiency At the Industrial/sectoral Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we use the super-efficiency DEA model to estimate WRUE. Referring to relevant literature on ER and WRUE (Dadabaev, 2016;Han et al, 2020;Singh and Gundimeda, 2021) and considering the availability of data, we select capital (X 1 ), labor (X 2 ), water (X 3 ), GDP (Y 1 ) and WD (Y 2 )capital, labor and water are input variables, and GDP and WD are output variables. The input and output variables are shown in the table below (Table 1).…”
Section: Super-efficiency Dea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%