2019
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of baseline coronary flow and its distribution on fractional flow reserve prediction

Abstract: Model‐based prediction of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the context of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis requires a number of modelling assumptions. One of these assumptions is the definition of a baseline coronary flow, ie, total coronary flow at rest prior to the administration of drugs needed to perform invasive measurements. Here we explore the impact of several methods available in the literature to estimate and distribute baseline coronary flow on FFR predictions obtained with a reduced‐o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Hyde et al 21 used animal cryomicrotome data to connect epicardial arteries and microvessels, with a one-way coupling between a 1D coronary model and a multi-compartment porous model: inclusion of vascular data significantly improves the continuum perfusion results in comparison to a more simplistically parameterized model. Conversely, knowledge of perfusion 16 and coronary flow repartition 9,33 may improve coronary model boundary conditions. Finally, Lee et al 29 proposed a two-way coupling between a 1D coronary model and a single compartment poromechanical model, applied to a porcine geometry extracted from cryomicrotome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Hyde et al 21 used animal cryomicrotome data to connect epicardial arteries and microvessels, with a one-way coupling between a 1D coronary model and a multi-compartment porous model: inclusion of vascular data significantly improves the continuum perfusion results in comparison to a more simplistically parameterized model. Conversely, knowledge of perfusion 16 and coronary flow repartition 9,33 may improve coronary model boundary conditions. Finally, Lee et al 29 proposed a two-way coupling between a 1D coronary model and a single compartment poromechanical model, applied to a porcine geometry extracted from cryomicrotome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm significantly reduces the model's sensitivity to the degree of details of a coronary tree and automatically considers coronary dominance type. In other works, this problem is partially solved by introducing additional coefficients [34], changing algorithm based on the coronary dominance type [11] or performing preliminary calculations [38]. All these approaches are valid and effective, but most of them can be further improved by implementing the recursive algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively, computational modeling provides a more convenient means of quantifying the impact of arrhythmia on myocardial perfusion and uncovering underlying mechanisms. Computational models of the coronary circulation have been widely applied to study the characteristics of coronary blood flow in the context of arrhythmia or coronary artery disease [10,12,13]. However, few studies have been dedicated to addressing the impact of arrhythmia on myocardial perfusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%