2011
DOI: 10.5539/apr.v3n1p115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Beam Quality Q for 137Cs on NK and ND,W for Different Types of Ionization Chambers

Abstract: The calibration of different types of ionization chambers in radiotherapy level is done using different beam qualities i.e. -rays from

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of measurement the dose rates measured at P1, P2, and P3 were found to be within 1.5% of the stated look-up table values of 11.235 Gy/min, 3.311 Gy/min, and 2.326 Gy/min, respectively. Since the expected uncertainty of these dose rate measurements is about 1.1% given all the related uncertainties for such a measurement added in quadrature, based on the uncertainty contribution factors from a recent publication summarizing the uncertainty of 137 Cs dosimetry(Hassan et al 2011), the stated look-up table values were used. 137 Cs has a physical half-life of 30.2 years and as such the output is very stable and only needs to be corrected by the time decay factor (annual decay of 2.3%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of measurement the dose rates measured at P1, P2, and P3 were found to be within 1.5% of the stated look-up table values of 11.235 Gy/min, 3.311 Gy/min, and 2.326 Gy/min, respectively. Since the expected uncertainty of these dose rate measurements is about 1.1% given all the related uncertainties for such a measurement added in quadrature, based on the uncertainty contribution factors from a recent publication summarizing the uncertainty of 137 Cs dosimetry(Hassan et al 2011), the stated look-up table values were used. 137 Cs has a physical half-life of 30.2 years and as such the output is very stable and only needs to be corrected by the time decay factor (annual decay of 2.3%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%