2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of bias in predicted height on tree volume estimation: A case-study of intrinsic nonlinearity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bimodal distribution in total carbon storage amongst the sample sites was found, the cause of which is likely attributable to the study design [34]; in this case, the sampling of two populations. Under a recently closed canopy of exotic species, tea tree growth rates are stunted.…”
Section: Bimodal Distributionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A bimodal distribution in total carbon storage amongst the sample sites was found, the cause of which is likely attributable to the study design [34]; in this case, the sampling of two populations. Under a recently closed canopy of exotic species, tea tree growth rates are stunted.…”
Section: Bimodal Distributionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This means that regression models or confidence intervals cannot be effectively applied to the data. Pedersen and Skovsgaard [34] state that due to the nature of the data, 'nonlinearity is often addressed, but rarely quantified' in the discipline of forestry science. Being a biological system, relationships between variables are often complex, resulting in data that do not follow a recognized distribution pattern [35].…”
Section: Sample Quantilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, multivariable regression analysis theory and methods were applied to model many other processes very well (e.g., chemical systems, scattered data sets in computational physics, the volume computation problem of forest trees, and major depressive disorder problems, etc.) 38 39 40 41 42 43 . In order to solve the key technical problem of requiring large data sets in executing the HMPR, we propose a statistical formula ( equation (4) in Methods) to construct the simulated data sets, which is larger than the experimental data sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known from control inventories that random measurement errors, for variables such as diameter and height, can be substantial even if the systematic errors generally are small (Daamen 1980). Random errors can also lead to increased random variation and systematic errors (bias) in predicted variables due to model non-linearity (for example, Gertner 1991, Pedersen & Skovsgaard 2009). The magnitude of this type of errors can be expected to be different on permanent sample plots compared to temporary sample plots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the described methods for growth estimation at tree level is affected by the sampling design, the correctness of the functions including model selection, the parameter estimation and the material used, non-explained residual variability, and measurement or classification errors in the input variables in applications (cf. Gertner & Dzialowy 1984, Smith & Burkhart 1984, Gertner 1986, Kangas 1996, Kangas 1998, Eid 2000, Canavan & Hann 2004, Pedersen & Skovsgaard 2009, Mäkinen et al 2010a. Measurement errors generally receive less attention and are assumed to be relatively small compared to sampling errors and regression function errors (Gertner 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%