2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of bioaugmentation by compost on the performance and ecology of an anaerobic digester fed with energy crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During startup, methane generation was slightly (6%) higher in digester B (366 mL g −1 VS compared with 344 mL g −1 VS in digester A), similar to reported observations by Neumann and Scherer upon adding compost. However, this difference remains within the margin of error of the measurements and the results can be considered comparable.…”
Section: Biogas Generationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During startup, methane generation was slightly (6%) higher in digester B (366 mL g −1 VS compared with 344 mL g −1 VS in digester A), similar to reported observations by Neumann and Scherer upon adding compost. However, this difference remains within the margin of error of the measurements and the results can be considered comparable.…”
Section: Biogas Generationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Accordingly, the addition of leachate and compost seems to have shifted the microbial community by ∼10% toward acetotrophs. This observation differs from reported findings in mesophilic systems, where the addition of hydrogenotroph‐rich compost resulted, at the end of the experiment, in a shift toward hydrogenotrophic methanogens . However, in this study, the hydrogenotroph‐rich leachate, added to digester B, was 94% dominated by the Methanomicrobiales order, which did not proliferate, presumably because of selective operational conditions and substrate composition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases, an unexplained positive or negative effect takes place. For instance, bioaugmentation with compost, which can be considered aerobic, resulted in a minor, but effective increase in methane production and faster start‐up of fodder beet silage digestion (Neumann and Scherer, ). In other cases, the addition of syntrophic bacteria led to an increase in methane production (Cavaleiro et al ., ), while other syntrophic strains could not stabilize or increase methane production (Westerholm et al ., ), despite an apparent similar role in the AD process.…”
Section: Structural Organization and Functioning In Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used for hazardous waste remediation, as well as for the biodegradation of wastewater in wastewater treatment plants and many others biological treatment processes [4]. In aerobic wastewater treatment, bioaugmentation has resulted in more reliable nitrification, biological phosphorous removal, improved sludge settling, enhanced grease degradation, and accelerated transformation of xenobiotic organic contaminants, such as pentachlorophenol [5,6,7,8]. Bioaugmentation has also been studied at laboratory scale to increase the methane production during the anaerobic digestion of animal manure [9], cellulose-rich [10,11], and lipid-rich waste [12] as well as seed biomass [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%