2010
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-11337-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of biomass burning on ocean water quality in Southeast Asia through atmospheric deposition: eutrophication modeling

Abstract: Abstract. Atmospheric deposition of nutrients (N and P species) can intensify anthropogenic eutrophication of coastal waters. It was found that the atmospheric wet and dry depositions of nutrients was remarkable in the Southeast Asian region during the course of smoke haze events, as discussed in a companion paper on field observations (Sundarambal et al., 2010b). The importance of atmospheric deposition of nutrients in terms of their biological responses in the coastal waters of the Singapore region was inves… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect could follow, as reported for elsewhere in the tropics (Sigha-Nkamdjou et al 2003;Baker et al 2006;Sundarambal et al 2010;Chen et al 2010), from the incidence of burning during the dry season (mainly done during March). Alternately, the seasonal difference could be by dilution owing to larger volume of more frequent rain during the wet season; we found, however, no relationship of concentrations and previous rain events (data not shown).…”
Section: Nutrients In Rainfallsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This effect could follow, as reported for elsewhere in the tropics (Sigha-Nkamdjou et al 2003;Baker et al 2006;Sundarambal et al 2010;Chen et al 2010), from the incidence of burning during the dry season (mainly done during March). Alternately, the seasonal difference could be by dilution owing to larger volume of more frequent rain during the wet season; we found, however, no relationship of concentrations and previous rain events (data not shown).…”
Section: Nutrients In Rainfallsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The U.S. National Emissions Inventory created by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that these fires contribute 34% of the total primary PM 2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters smaller than 2.5 μm) emitted in the United States (NEI, 2014). Fire-emitted particles are harmful to human health (Cascio, 2018;Crouse et al, 2012;Gan et al, 2017;Johnston et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2015;Reid et al, 2016;Yao et al, 2018), visibility (Bond et al, 2013;Brewer & Moore, 2009;Ford et al, 2018), and ecosystems (Abram et al, 2003;Sundarambal et al, 2010). Due to climatic and socioeconomic changes, wildfire activities, including the number of large wildfires, total burned areas of large wildfires, wildfire durations, and wildfire seasons, have increased in recent decades (Dennison et al, 2014;Westerling et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the new productivity was estimated to be 1.733 ± 1.681 mg C·m −2 ·hr −1 over the SCS in 2009, representing a more typical summer. Although we have shown the potential effects of Indonesian forest fire-derived atmospheric wet AND to the marine ecosystem, the nonuniform spatial-temporal distribution of wet deposition, and nonnegligible deposition of other nutrients (e.g., P or Fe) and dry AND probably largely account for the new productivity (Hsu et al, 2014;Sundarambal, Tkalich, et al, 2010). Atmospheric deposition is also a potential mechanism for increasing Fe or P in the surface seawaters, thereby enhancing new productivity or nitrogen (N 2 ) fixation (Abram et al, 2003;Ponettegonzález et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2000).…”
Section: Marine Biological Responses To Forest Fire-derived Nitrogen mentioning
confidence: 95%