2022
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.202270007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Cell Loading of Recombinant Spider Silk Based Bioinks on Gelation and Printability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the aptamer‐modified nanohydrogels concerning their cell binding capabilities, we compared HeLa binding to sgc8 aptamer in Figure 1C–E to surfaces made of eADF4(C16)‐RGD variant (Figure S5, Supporting Information), which has been established to enhance attachment of cells to spider silk‐based coatings [ 36,37 ] and printable hydrogels. [ 38,39 ] On the one side, the aptamer‐to‐marker binding resulted in similar binding densities as native RGD‐to‐integrin binding on the corresponding protein films (both at ≈55 000 cells cm −2 ). On the other side, assembled nanohydrogels made of the same protein displayed approximately 40% better cell adhesion in comparison to the RGD‐films (Figure S5, Supporting Information) likely due to improved binding motif accessibility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To assess the aptamer‐modified nanohydrogels concerning their cell binding capabilities, we compared HeLa binding to sgc8 aptamer in Figure 1C–E to surfaces made of eADF4(C16)‐RGD variant (Figure S5, Supporting Information), which has been established to enhance attachment of cells to spider silk‐based coatings [ 36,37 ] and printable hydrogels. [ 38,39 ] On the one side, the aptamer‐to‐marker binding resulted in similar binding densities as native RGD‐to‐integrin binding on the corresponding protein films (both at ≈55 000 cells cm −2 ). On the other side, assembled nanohydrogels made of the same protein displayed approximately 40% better cell adhesion in comparison to the RGD‐films (Figure S5, Supporting Information) likely due to improved binding motif accessibility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid hydrogels of self‐assembling silk proteins provided sufficient stability for the initial immobilization and cultivation phases and allowed the captured cells to gradually replace the artificial scaffold and create a native cell environment without negatively affecting cellular homeostasis. [ 38,39,50 ] The stability of the aptamers involved is also apparently sufficient for both the cell immobilization, as they can still be detected after cell release by annealing a fluorescent probe (Figure S4C, Supporting Information) and the cultivation enabling cell spreading (Figure 4). In our previous study, cultivation of DNA‐modified HeLa cells immobilized on complementary modified nanohydrogels failed due to short‐term stability (<2 h) of the DNA modification integrated via a lipid anchor into the cellular membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, attempts to disperse the fibrils from the cluster by ultrasonication or vigorous stirring induce energetic or shear forces, hence impacting fibril appearance. Nevertheless, sulfate ions can play a role in the preparation of fibril‐based hydrogels made of eADF4(C16) at higher protein concentrations (>1%) (Lechner et al, 2022; Schacht et al, 2015), resulting in branching into higher E‐moduli of the gels, impacting their processing via 3D printing or even cell differentiation in biofabrication procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 28–30 ] Using chemically modified surfaces with the protein [ 31 ] or ultrathin nanofilms thereof, [ 32 ] the spider silk nanofibrils assembled on top into immobilized physically crosslinked networks, which displayed swelling and softening in the water, that is, properties similar to the bulk spider silk hydrogels. [ 33,34 ] The nanofibrillar nature of these nanohydrogels enabled a higher modification density and greater substrate accessibility compared to monolayers, whilst the mild aqueous self‐assembly conditions in combination with the mechanical and chemical robustness of the nanohydrogels provided excellent scaffolds for embedding sensitive components such as enzymes and aptamers. [ 32 ] Spider silk proteins could be modified using both chemical [ 32,35 ] and genetic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%