“…Award Address (ACS Award in Analytical Chemistry sponsored by the Battelle Memorial Institute). Abstracts of Papers, 255th ACS National Meeting and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, United States, March 18–22, 2018, ANYL‐368) addressed this question using the diagram shown in Figure 1, where the major structure analysis techniques are compared in terms of “ease of use” and “information‐richness.” NMR, XRD, and cryo‐EM are capable of providing the highest resolution structural information; but when the complete suite of native MS/IM‐MS structural tools, for example, collision‐induced unfolding (CIU; Polasky et al, 2019), collisional‐induced dissociation (CID; Donor, Shepherd, & Prell, 2020), surface‐induced dissociation (SID; Zhou & Wysocki, 2014), ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD; Sipe & Brodbelt, 2019), and infrared multiphoton dissociation (Pagel et al, 2009; Seo et al, 2017), are factored into the equation, native‐MS offers an unprecedented advantage in the field of structural biology.…”