2016
DOI: 10.1016/bs.agron.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Climate Change Factors on Weeds and Herbicide Efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
152
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
2
152
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Environmental factors such as temperature, light, moisture, and relative humidity may have differentially affect the uptake, translocation, and activity of herbicides (Varanasi et al, 2016). 3).…”
Section: Weed Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). Environmental factors such as temperature, light, moisture, and relative humidity may have differentially affect the uptake, translocation, and activity of herbicides (Varanasi et al, 2016). 3).…”
Section: Weed Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, herbicide efficiency on weed biomass was variable among the site-years (data not shown). Environmental factors such as temperature, light, moisture, and relative humidity may have differentially affect the uptake, translocation, and activity of herbicides (Varanasi et al, 2016). Also, environmental variations (Table 2) and stubble management such as chem fallow in Leth15 and barley silage stubble in Leth16 compared with wheat stubble in all other sites might have contributed to the variation in weed responsible.…”
Section: Weed Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change not only affects the biology of weeds and their interference ability, but it also impacts the efficacy of certain weed management strategies. An elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentration has been reported to have a remarkable impact on the efficacy of various herbicides used to control different weed species . Several studies have reported a decline in the herbicide efficacy at elevated CO 2 as compared to the ambient CO 2 concentration .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isso talvez seja explicado pelo produto ser sistêmico e pelo metabolismo destas plantas daninhas serem diferentes (Varanasi et al, 2016). Capim-braquiária é uma planta C 4 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…As plantas C 4 perdem em torno de 100 moléculas de H 2 O por molécula de CO 2 fixada enquanto que as plantas C 3 perdem em torno de 600 moléculas de H 2 O por molécula de CO 2 fixada (Dietrich et al, 2001). Assim, a maior adaptação à climas áridos, conferida às plantas de mecanismo fotossintético C4, pode ser explicada à sua maior condutância mesofílica, que por sua vez, resultam em menor condutância estomática e maior eficiência no uso da água (Varanasi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified