2013
DOI: 10.1002/joc.3770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of climate change on rainfall in Northwestern Bangladesh using multi‐GCM ensembles

Abstract: Teesta River basin, located in the northwest of Bangladesh, is more vulnerable to floods if compared to other parts of the country. In this context, daily rainfall data of ten raingauge stations located in the catchment of the Jamuneswari River, part of the Teesta River basin, were analysed to study the impact of climate change on rainfall. Length of wet and dry series and mean monthly rainfalls along with their variances were used for validating Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS‐WG). The an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in September, the error in the mean values between the observed and modeled series was only 1.2%, but the difference in standard deviations was large. The standard deviation of the modeled series was 0.455 • C, much lower than the value for the observed series of 0.833 • C. The model precision here was acceptable overall within the same level as other model applications [42][43][44], thus indicating the dependability of LARS-WG in downscaling analysis to this study area. These series of synthetic daily weather data were then used as input data for the verified ReNuMa to estimate further changes in the watershed hydrochemical processes, as described in detail in Section 3.3.…”
Section: Lars-wg Modelsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Similarly, in September, the error in the mean values between the observed and modeled series was only 1.2%, but the difference in standard deviations was large. The standard deviation of the modeled series was 0.455 • C, much lower than the value for the observed series of 0.833 • C. The model precision here was acceptable overall within the same level as other model applications [42][43][44], thus indicating the dependability of LARS-WG in downscaling analysis to this study area. These series of synthetic daily weather data were then used as input data for the verified ReNuMa to estimate further changes in the watershed hydrochemical processes, as described in detail in Section 3.3.…”
Section: Lars-wg Modelsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Kumar et al . () used the Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS‐WG) (Semenov and Barrow, ) to simulate daily rainfall data for 10 rainfall stations located in the Jamuneswari catchment of Teesta River basin. The model was found to well‐reproduce the monthly mean and variance for most of the months, but could not satisfactorily reproduce the wet and dry spells for non‐monsoon months (December to January).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LARS-WG is a well-known daily WG frequently employed in climate change impact assessment studies. This model has been used worldwide for a diverse set of climatic conditions and has been shown capable of reproducing various statistics of weather variables on daily timescale as well as their extreme values (Semenov et al, 1998;Semenov, 2008;Semenov et al, 2013;Kumar et al, 2014;Lu et al, 2015;Agarwal et al, 2016;Bian et al, 2017). However, this model performs poorly with regards to reproducing the LFV of variables in its outputs (Semenov et al, 1998;Khazaei et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Basic Wgmentioning
confidence: 99%