Impact of combined FDG-PET/CT and MRI on the detection of local recurrence and nodal metastases in thyroid cancer

Abstract

BackgroundSuspected recurrence of thyroid carcinoma is a diagnostic challenge when findings of both a radio iodine whole body scan and ultrasound are negative. PET/CT and MRI have shown to be feasible for detection of recurrent disease. However, the added value of a consensus reading by the radiologist and the nuclear medicine physician, which has been deemed to be helpful in clinical routines, has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the impact of combined FDG-PET/ldCT and MRI on detection of locally recurrent TC and nodal metastases in high-risk patients with special focus on the value of the multidisciplinary consensus reading.Materials and methodsForty-six patients with suspected locally recurrent thyroid cancer or nodal metastases after thyroidectomy and radio-iodine therapy were retrospectively selected for analysis. Inclusion criteria comprised elevated thyroglobulin blood levels, a negative ultrasound, negative iodine whole body scan, as well as combined FDG-PET/ldCT and MRI examinations.Neck compartments in FDG-PET/ldCT and MRI examinations were independently analyzed by two blinded observers for local recurrence and nodal metastases of thyroid cancer. Consecutively, the scans were read in consensus. To explore a possible synergistic effect, FDG-PET/ldCT and MRI results were combined. Histopathology or long-term follow-up served as a gold standard.For method comparison, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated.ResultsFDG-PET/ldCT was substantially more sensitive and more specific than MRI in detection of both local recurrence and nodal metastases. Inter-observer agreement was substantial both for local recurrence (κ = 0.71) and nodal metastasis (κ = 0.63) detection in FDG-PET/ldCT. For MRI, inter-observer agreement was substantial for local recurrence (κ = 0.69) and moderate for nodal metastasis (κ = 0.55) detection. In contrast, FDG-PET/ldCT and MRI showed only slight agreement (κ = 0.21). However, both imaging modalities identified different true positive results. Thus, the combination created a synergistic effect. The multidisciplinary consensus reading further increased sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionsFDG-PET/ldCT and MRI are complementary imaging modalities and should be combined to improve detection of local recurrence and nodal metastases of thyroid cancer in high-risk patients. The multidisciplinary consensus reading is a key element in the diagnostic approach.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40644-016-0096-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Advantage of PET/CT in Target Delineation of MRI-negative Cervical Lymph Nodes In Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

“…Previous studies in patients with NPC and other head and neck cancers have indicated that 18 F-FDG PET/CT was superior to CT and MRI for metastasis detection in CLNs 23 - 25 . However, the superiority of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for MRI-negative lymph nodes has not been demonstrated clearly.…”

Whole-Body 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI Versus 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors

“…However, this reflects the situation in routine clinical imaging of well-differentiated NETs, where—because of the slow growth of these tumors and the rather favorable prognosis in terms of survival—follow-up examinations are more common than pretherapeutic staging. Another limitation that our study shares with previous studies of similar design 24 , 28 , 29 is our use of a composite standard of reference for lesion verification, which was mostly based on previous imaging and follow-up examinations. While biopsies would have been the most reliable and thus preferable means of solving discrepancies between PET/MRI and PET/CT, this would not have been clinically feasible and would even have been unethical, as it would not have affected the management of any of these patients.…”

Imaging and Imaging-Based Management of Pediatric Thyroid Nodules

“…Furthermore, radiation exposure is not an issue with MRI. However, similar to CT, MRI is not recommended in the routine clinical workup of all thyroid cancer patients of a younger age [56].…”