2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01257-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of comorbidity assessment methods to predict non-cancer mortality risk in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study using the National Health Insurance Service claims-based data in Korea

Abstract: Background Cancer patients’ prognoses are complicated by comorbidities. Prognostic prediction models with inappropriate comorbidity adjustments yield biased survival estimates. However, an appropriate claims-based comorbidity risk assessment method remains unclear. This study aimed to compare methods used to capture comorbidities from claims data and predict non-cancer mortality risks among cancer patients. Methods Data were obtained from the Natio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since all patients in this cohort study had RA, and we were interested in how comorbidities, not RA, affected outcomes. We used an adjusted score that removed the rheumatic components of the CCI (a maximum of 1 point was deducted from the score) [ 18 20 ]. Using this data, we estimated survival to mortality (from first RA record) and rates of, and time to adverse outcome of revision, peri-prosthetic fracture, infection, VTE, and mechanical loosening using further ICD codes (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all patients in this cohort study had RA, and we were interested in how comorbidities, not RA, affected outcomes. We used an adjusted score that removed the rheumatic components of the CCI (a maximum of 1 point was deducted from the score) [ 18 20 ]. Using this data, we estimated survival to mortality (from first RA record) and rates of, and time to adverse outcome of revision, peri-prosthetic fracture, infection, VTE, and mechanical loosening using further ICD codes (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%