Background
The clinical efficacy of hyper-CVAD (HCVAD) + ponatinib has not been compared to that of HCVAD + dasatinib in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in a randomized clinical trial.
Methods
We analyzed 110 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL enrolled in two consecutive prospective phase 2 clinical trials of frontline HCVAD with either dasatinib (n=63) or ponatinib (n=47). Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching with the nearest neighbor matching method, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis based on the propensity scores were performed to assess response rates, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) between cohorts.
Results
Propensity score matching identified 41 patients in each cohort. With propensity score matching, the 3-year EFS rates for HCVAD + ponatinib and HCVAD + dasatinib were 69% and 46%, respectively (p=0.04), and the 3-year OS rates were 83% and 56%, respectively (p=0.03). Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis using pre-matching cohorts showed that HCVAD + ponatinib had significantly higher rates of minimal residual disease negativity by flow cytometry on day 21, complete cytogenetic response at complete response (CR), major molecular response at CR and 3 months, and complete molecular response at 3 months. IPTW confirmed that HCVAD + ponatinib was associated with longer EFS (p=0.003) and OS (p=0.001) compared to HCVAD + dasatinib.
Conclusion
The clinical outcome of HCVAD + ponatinib appears superior to that of HCVAD + dasatinib in patients with Ph+ ALL.