2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of conservation practices on soil aggregation and the carbon management index after seven years of maize–wheat cropping system in the Indian Himalayas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the close relationship of these C indices with physical, chemical and biological soil properties confirms their usefulness as soil quality indicators, as well as their high sensitivity to soil changes due to management systems. Few studies have examined the relationship of CMI, SR-TOC and SR-LF with crop yield (Ghosh et al, 2016;Vieira et al, 2007). In this work, we found a poor relationship (p > 0.17) between soil C indices and maize yield (average of five crop seasons, 2001-2005) ( Table 6).…”
Section: Carbon Stratification Ratiomentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Moreover, the close relationship of these C indices with physical, chemical and biological soil properties confirms their usefulness as soil quality indicators, as well as their high sensitivity to soil changes due to management systems. Few studies have examined the relationship of CMI, SR-TOC and SR-LF with crop yield (Ghosh et al, 2016;Vieira et al, 2007). In this work, we found a poor relationship (p > 0.17) between soil C indices and maize yield (average of five crop seasons, 2001-2005) ( Table 6).…”
Section: Carbon Stratification Ratiomentioning
confidence: 62%
“…LOC was determined by using 333 mmol L −1 KMnO 4 Oxidation Method, and measured by the spectrophotometric of 565 nm wave length 65 . The total SOC was considered as equal to the total soil carbon because the measured inorganic carbon (carbonates) contents of the samples were almost nil 66 . Carbon Management Index (CMI) was calculated using the procedure outlined below 65 , 66 , using the no-reclamation forest soil as reference sample: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest AAGR of aggregate C concentration was observed in the 0.053-0.25 mm fraction (8.8%) under NT. One reason for this result could be that when the ability of particulate organic carbon to be a nucleation site for the formation of new aggregates was restricted in the steady aggregation state under notillage (Bossuyt et al 2004;Rabbi et al 2015;Song et al 2016), hydrolysable organic carbon probably became the major carbon source and was adsorbed or preserved by microaggregates (Ochoa et al 2009;Ghosh et al 2016). However, the higher AAGR of aggregate C concentration in microaggregates is probably due to multiple factors and needs to be further investigated, especially under NT.…”
Section: Aggregate-associated C Concentration Within Aggregate Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%