Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture

Abstract

On average, we urban dwellers spend about 90% of our time indoors, and share the intuition that the physical features of the places we live and work in influence how we feel and act. However, there is surprisingly little research on how architecture impacts behavior, much less on how it influences brain function. To begin closing this gap, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study to examine how systematic variation in contour impacts aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions, outcome measures of interest to both architects and users of spaces alike. As predicted, participants were more likely to judge spaces as beautiful if they were curvilinear than rectilinear. Neuroanatomically, when contemplating beauty, curvilinear contour activated the anterior cingulate cortex exclusively, a region strongly responsive to the reward properties and emotional salience of objects. Complementing this finding, pleasantness-the valence dimension of the affect circumplex-accounted for nearly 60% of the variance in beauty ratings. Furthermore, activation in a distributed brain network known to underlie the aesthetic evaluation of different types of visual stimuli covaried with beauty ratings. In contrast, contour did not affect approach-avoidance decisions, although curvilinear spaces activated the visual cortex. The results suggest that the well-established effect of contour on aesthetic preference can be extended to architecture. Furthermore, the combination of our behavioral and neural evidence underscores the role of emotion in our preference for curvilinear objects in this domain.neuroaesthetics | design | curvature | habitat theory

Up speeds you down. Awe-evoking monumental buildings trigger behavioral and perceived freezing

“…Within environmental psychology, behavioral responses towards environments or environmental features are frequently researched, but these studies have traditionally focused on approach and avoidance behavior as typical behavioral outcomes (Russell & Mehrabian, 1978;Stamps, 2005;Gilboa & Rafaeli, 2003;Vartanian et al, 2013;Vartanian et al, 2015). We M A N U S C R I P T…”

In the light of evolution VII: The human mental machinery

“…A complementary phenomenon provides the focus for Oshin Vartanian et al (18), who provide for the first time clues on how variation in contour impacts aesthetic judgments and approach decisions about the places in which we live and work, thereby influencing how we feel and act. Subjects are more likely to judge spaces as beautiful if they are curvilinear rather than rectilinear.…”

Neuroanatomical Correlates of Perceived Usability

“…For instance, we observed strong activation in the left middle frontal gyrus, suggesting that people rate the perceived aesthetics of webpages similarly to pictures and architecture stimuli [46,84]. This may be because most webpages include commodity design elements such as columns, frames and headings.…”