2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3175-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of contrast injection and stent-graft implantation on reproducibility of volume measurements in semiautomated segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysm on computed tomography

Abstract: • AAA volumetry by semiautomated segmentation is accurate on CT following endovascular repair. • AAA volumetry by semiautomated segmentation is accurate on unenhanced CT. • Standardization of the segmentation technique maximizes the reproducibility of volume measurements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this was still classified as excellent agreement, this small discrepancy may be due to the vascular outlet of the right subclavian artery, which may be partially included in the measurement depending on the slice of acquisition. The results of this study are in line with previously reported inter-reader agreements of ICC > 0.82, including studies that segmented abdominal aortic diameters [ 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. However, compared to these studies, there was no observer bias regarding average diameters observed for the segmentation tool or the readers [ 1 , 21 ]; this is in contrast to a study by Asch et al in which ICC decreased to 0.73–0.85 among the thoracic segments of the aorta when measurements were compared between clinical centers and core laboratories with standardized measuring protocols [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although this was still classified as excellent agreement, this small discrepancy may be due to the vascular outlet of the right subclavian artery, which may be partially included in the measurement depending on the slice of acquisition. The results of this study are in line with previously reported inter-reader agreements of ICC > 0.82, including studies that segmented abdominal aortic diameters [ 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. However, compared to these studies, there was no observer bias regarding average diameters observed for the segmentation tool or the readers [ 1 , 21 ]; this is in contrast to a study by Asch et al in which ICC decreased to 0.73–0.85 among the thoracic segments of the aorta when measurements were compared between clinical centers and core laboratories with standardized measuring protocols [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The labeling provided by the mapping may be useful for surgical navigation [169]. Semiautomated volumetry of abdominal aortic aneurysms on CT has also been reported [170]. …”
Section: Blood Vessels: Abdominal Atherosclerosis and Vessel Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%