“…Although this was still classified as excellent agreement, this small discrepancy may be due to the vascular outlet of the right subclavian artery, which may be partially included in the measurement depending on the slice of acquisition. The results of this study are in line with previously reported inter-reader agreements of ICC > 0.82, including studies that segmented abdominal aortic diameters [ 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. However, compared to these studies, there was no observer bias regarding average diameters observed for the segmentation tool or the readers [ 1 , 21 ]; this is in contrast to a study by Asch et al in which ICC decreased to 0.73–0.85 among the thoracic segments of the aorta when measurements were compared between clinical centers and core laboratories with standardized measuring protocols [ 22 , 23 ].…”