2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of conventional anesthesia on auditory brainstem responses in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
31
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to those reported for mice showing that ABR thresholds are significantly lower in the awake than in the ketamine/xylazine anesthetized condition (difference of 8.0 ± 1.8 dB) [19]. In contrast varying isoflurane levels in geckos and anoles reveals little effect on the ABR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These results are similar to those reported for mice showing that ABR thresholds are significantly lower in the awake than in the ketamine/xylazine anesthetized condition (difference of 8.0 ± 1.8 dB) [19]. In contrast varying isoflurane levels in geckos and anoles reveals little effect on the ABR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Before surgery, the auditory brainstem response (ABR) was measured to obtain hearing thresholds in 17 animals at 4, 8, 16, and 32 kHz, as described previously (van Looij et al, 2004). Rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (0.08 ml/10 g body weight of a solution containing 0.12% xylazine and 0.8% ketamine in 0.9% NaCl).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous in-vivo studies of SPON physiology were conducted under ketamine anesthesia (Behrend et al, 2002; Dehmel et al, 2002; Kulesza Jr. et al, 2003; 2007; Kadner et al, 2006; Kadner and Berrebi, 2008), which is known to alter brainstem auditory evoked potentials, resulting in higher peak latencies (Church and Gritzke, 1987; Smith and Mills, 1989; 1991) and elevated thresholds (van Looij et al, 2004). Both of these effects are thought to be mediated by antagonism of the N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor (NMDAR; Anis et al, 1983; Harrison and Simmonds, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%