2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on NO2 and PM2.5 exposure inequalities in London, UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second most influential policy was C5 "Close public transport", which explained 52.3% of the NO2 anomaly. This is consistent with many existing studies, which find that the transportation sector affected reductions in NO2 during the COVID-19 pandemic [10,11]. The third dominant factor is C1 "School closing", where school closure measures explained 46.4% of the NO2 anomaly.…”
Section: Quantifying Different Policy Effects On No2 Anomaliessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second most influential policy was C5 "Close public transport", which explained 52.3% of the NO2 anomaly. This is consistent with many existing studies, which find that the transportation sector affected reductions in NO2 during the COVID-19 pandemic [10,11]. The third dominant factor is C1 "School closing", where school closure measures explained 46.4% of the NO2 anomaly.…”
Section: Quantifying Different Policy Effects On No2 Anomaliessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The reduction in transport sector emissions is reported as the main cause for global NO2 anomalies [8]. London experienced a 50% decrease in NO2 during lockdown, with the highest NO2 emission reductions observed during morning rush hours due to the radical changes in routine life and commuting time [10]. Observations from other mega-cities, such as New York [11], Tokyo [12], Moscow [7] and Toronto [13], also showed a decrease in NO2 concentrations during lockdowns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings apply to outdoor conditions; they may vary in indoor spaces due to distinct physicochemical interactions and environmental conditions in indoor locations [ 206 , 207 ]. Other studies found a decline in PM 2.5 and PM 10 from January to the end of May due to lockdown and broad limitations in nations [ 82 , 208 ].…”
Section: Scope and Long-term Prevalence Of Lockdownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of 29 March 2020, 214 and 199 countries (regions) across the world reported COVID-19 infections and deaths, respectively, with the coefficient of variation at the national scale of 4.20 and 3.82, and the Gini index of 0.87 and 0.88, respectively, suggesting that there is great variation in the global spread and distribution of COVID-19 virus. At the same time, Mizumoto [ 64 ] believes that there is a statistical correlation between health facilities and COVID-19 infection rate based on multiple regression analysis; Xie [ 65 ] holds that the quantity of hospital beds and medical workers has a positive impact on the spatial differentiation of COVID-19; Deguen [ 66 ], Pei [ 67 ], Ramirez [ 68 ], Kazakos et al [ 69 ] conclude that environmental pollution and meteorological conditions such as PM2.5, NOx and air temperature are in a significant correlation with the spatial distribution of COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%