2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on urology surgical waiting lists and waiting lists prioritization strategies in the post-COVID-19 era

Abstract: Introduction The suspension of most elective surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic caused the lengthening of urology surgical waiting lists. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urology surgical waiting list in a high-volume hospital. Methods An observational descriptive study was designed. All patients included in the urology surgical waiting list of our high-volume center on May 1 st 2020 (46 days after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant reduction in waiting time in those months was seen for partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy; a reduction trend was seen also for radical nephrectomy/nephroureterectomy and radical cystectomy. A decrease in elective oncological surgical activity has already been reported by other studies, also in the urologic oncology field; however, this finding has been associated to an increase in the average waiting time for surgery [ 3 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Our findings might be explained by the fact that, during the months of the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer cancer diagnoses were performed at our center, leading to a shorter patients’ waiting list for surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A significant reduction in waiting time in those months was seen for partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy; a reduction trend was seen also for radical nephrectomy/nephroureterectomy and radical cystectomy. A decrease in elective oncological surgical activity has already been reported by other studies, also in the urologic oncology field; however, this finding has been associated to an increase in the average waiting time for surgery [ 3 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Our findings might be explained by the fact that, during the months of the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer cancer diagnoses were performed at our center, leading to a shorter patients’ waiting list for surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A total of 53 articles met the inclusion criteria for analysis (Figure 1). Of the 53 articles selected, 37 analyzed changes in realized access applying quantitative methods , through the analysis of medical records (Table 1), 8 analyzed changes in potential access [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90] via surveys of different population groups, except for one that did the same via analysis of medical records [90] (Table 2), 7 used qualitative methods to analyze the impact on potential access [91][92][93][94][95][96][97] (Table 3), and, finally, 1 study analyzed changes in both realized and potential access [98] using mixed methods (analysis of medical records and semi-structured interviews). Only six of the studies that explored changes in potential access included professionals from the health centers analyzed as a study population, [87,89,92,93,97,98], while the rest focused on patients or the general population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of geographical area, 19 studies were conducted in European countries [47,51,53,55,57,62,64,[67][68][69][70]75,79,83,84,88,90,92,95], 9 in North American countries [49,58,59,77,78,80,82,85,86], 9 in Sub-Saharan Africa [46,48,71,72,76,87,93,94,98], 3 in Latin America [60,91,96], 5 in the East Asia-Pacific region [50,56,61,66,81], 3 in South Asia [63,65,74], 2 in the North Africa-Middle East region [52], and, lastly, 3 studies covered various regions…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the particular case of prostate cancer, the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact both on early diagnosis by reducing participation to screening programs [ 10 ] and on time from diagnosis to surgery/radiotherapy [ 11 ], which may translate in a worse prostate-cancer-specific mortality in the next years [ 12 ]. In spite of the hurdles associated with diagnosis of prostate cancer [ 13 ], population-based prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has proven to reduce prostate-cancer-specific mortality, although over 1000 men have to be screened to prevent a single death from prostate cancer [ 14 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another retrospective observational study conducted in 2020 at a high-volume center was designed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on time to surgery of patients on the urology surgical waiting list. In the overall cohort of 350 patients (including 20 patients with prostate cancer), the mean time of 97.33 days on the waiting list was reported, which was significantly longer compared with that reported in 2019 [ 11 ]. In a population-based study exploring patterns of radiotherapy use, mean weekly radiotherapy courses decreased by 19.9% in April, 6.2% in May and 11.6% in June 2020 compared with corresponding months in 2019, with the largest reduction reported for prostate cancer (77.0% in April) [ 15 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%