PsycEXTRA Dataset 2009
DOI: 10.1037/e518422013-369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of cyberloafing on affect, work depletion, facilitation, and engagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This classification is based on the functions of cyberloafing. In another study, Lim and Chen [ 55 ] divided cyberloafing into two types: browsing activities and emailing activities. This categorization is based on the level of control over the activities as well as the effort and energy requirements of the activities [ 12 ].…”
Section: Hypotheses and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This classification is based on the functions of cyberloafing. In another study, Lim and Chen [ 55 ] divided cyberloafing into two types: browsing activities and emailing activities. This categorization is based on the level of control over the activities as well as the effort and energy requirements of the activities [ 12 ].…”
Section: Hypotheses and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study done in 2008 by Blanchard and Henle [23], as cited by Zoghbi-Manriquw-de-Lara (2012), suggests that minor cyberloafing is innocuous. However, both serious and minor loafing activities have negative impact on employees' job outcomes [24].…”
Section: Cyber-loafing In the Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We controlled for variables that might influence cyberloafing behaviour. Respondents' gender (coded as 0 = male, 1 = female) was controlled for because men are more likely to engage in cyberloafing than women (Lim & Chen, 2009). Age was controlled because it has been found that individuals in their late 20s to early 30s are more likely to use the Internet (Reed, Doty, & May, 2005).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%