2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of dataset size and variety on the effectiveness of deep learning and transfer learning for plant disease classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
245
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 482 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
245
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Data diversity is one of the key factors to ensure the generalization ability of the model [37]. Although the study used nearly 10,000 images, the amount of data was still small for 10 soybean varieties.…”
Section: Comparison Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data diversity is one of the key factors to ensure the generalization ability of the model [37]. Although the study used nearly 10,000 images, the amount of data was still small for 10 soybean varieties.…”
Section: Comparison Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if the seeds are not severely wet (seed color does not change and seeds do not swell), the relative humidity has no influence on the method of hyperspectral imaging combined deep learning. At present, deep networks have been successfully applied to plant disease identification [36][37][38], drought monitoring [39], land type classification [40], weed detection [41], and other areas of agriculture. To date, there are few reports on the identification of soybean seed varieties by deep learning, and whether it has advantages that is also unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training beyond 10 epochs did not improve the accuracy hence it was stopped as it may result in overfitting. When the model is excessively trained, it memorizes the patterns of the training dataset leading to a poor generalization 15,30 . The architecture trained with RGB images resulted in a maximum mean classification accuracy of 95.1% and when the proportion of samples for each class was taken into consideration, the accuracy was 94.7% as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence there is a lack of availability of large disease dataset which is a potential area for improvement. Also, it demands a costly system equipped with a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) and large Random Access Memory (RAM) for training the models 12,13,15 . Some of the studies used an approach called transfer learning approach where the pre-trained models have been used for disease classification 1,12,14-17 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, computer vision based machine learning algorithms-those which are able to identify objects in images-require a large amount of training data to be able to recognise any specific object. The accuracy of these algorithms deteriorates rapidly if insufficient training data are available [26][27][28], and, in some cases, simpler statistical methods have been shown to perform better than deep learning algorithms for object recognition [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%