2017
DOI: 10.1086/694461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of deposit-feeding chironomid larvae (Chironomus riparius) on meiofauna and protozoans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed to be ingested as animal remains together with detritus (Sadler 1935;Izvekova et al 1983). Small invertebrates (copepods, rotifers, chironomids, oligochaetes), however, especially when occurring in high numbers, can be actively preyed upon by Chironomus larvae (Loden 1974;Izvekova et al 1983;Ptatscheck et al 2017). In our research, this seems likely especially with regard to the filter-feeder C. balatonicus, the gut contents of which contained a higher frequency of planktonic rotifers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…It is assumed to be ingested as animal remains together with detritus (Sadler 1935;Izvekova et al 1983). Small invertebrates (copepods, rotifers, chironomids, oligochaetes), however, especially when occurring in high numbers, can be actively preyed upon by Chironomus larvae (Loden 1974;Izvekova et al 1983;Ptatscheck et al 2017). In our research, this seems likely especially with regard to the filter-feeder C. balatonicus, the gut contents of which contained a higher frequency of planktonic rotifers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Consequently, they impact the physical properties of sediments and drive biogeochemical processes in lake ecosystems (Ólafsson and Paterson 2004;Hölker et al 2015). The presence and feeding activities of chironomids also have impacts on the structures of meiofaunal and protozoan communities (Ptatscheck et al 2017;Webert et al 2017). Additionally, tube structures, by themselves, can exert considerable effects on the periphytic diatom flora living on river rocks (Pringle 1985;Hershey et al 1988;Herren et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nematodes, oligochaetes, and microcrustaceans, these effects even were significant. Further investigations of a natural meiofaunal community revealed the effects of the feeding of Chironomus riparius (Ptatscheck et al, 2017). The total meiofaunal density was reduced to 56% by a single chironomid larvae after one day already.…”
Section: Predation Effects On Meiofaunal Composition and Population Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For macroinvertebrates that ingest their prey intact, engulfing large meiofauna may be challenging. For example, Chironomus riparius with body length of 11.4 mm significantly reduced only the medium-sized nematodes (0.125-1 mm) from natural sediments, while larger larvae (13.5 mm) were able to consume larger nematodes with body length of 1-2 mm (Ptatscheck et al, 2015(Ptatscheck et al, , 2017. In contrast, chironomids of the taxon Tanypodinae that crush their prey can consume much larger prey organisms like oligochaetes or other chironomids (Baker & McLachlan, 1979).…”
Section: Predation Effects On Meiofaunal Composition and Population Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation