2009
DOI: 10.1002/da.20390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of depression on treatment effectiveness and gains maintenance in social phobia: a naturalistic study of cognitive behavior group therapy

Abstract: MDD at the onset of CBGT was not associated with poorer treatment response, but predicted exacerbation of SP symptoms following treatment termination. Depressed SPs may need additional intervention to maintain CBGT gains. SSPs may benefit from less intensive CBGT than GSPs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
19
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants who met criteria for severe fear in only 1 or 2 situations (public speaking, eating or drinking in front of others, or writing in from of others) were designated as the non-generalized subtype (NGSP). The designation of individuals with severe, but limited social fears as a comparative group is consistent with prior research (e.g., Boone et al, 1999; Heimberg et al, 1990; Turner et al 1992; Marom et al, 2009). In this investigation, 95% of the NGSP group had public speaking fears only, whereas the other 5% expressed severe fear when speaking and eating/drinking in front of others (i.e., informal settings).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Participants who met criteria for severe fear in only 1 or 2 situations (public speaking, eating or drinking in front of others, or writing in from of others) were designated as the non-generalized subtype (NGSP). The designation of individuals with severe, but limited social fears as a comparative group is consistent with prior research (e.g., Boone et al, 1999; Heimberg et al, 1990; Turner et al 1992; Marom et al, 2009). In this investigation, 95% of the NGSP group had public speaking fears only, whereas the other 5% expressed severe fear when speaking and eating/drinking in front of others (i.e., informal settings).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Epidemiological and treatment-seeking samples (e.g., Ohayon & Schatzberg, 2010; Regier et al, 1998; Schatzberg, Samson, Rothschild, Bond, & Regier, 1998) indicate that a percentage of patients with a primary SP diagnosis also have comorbid depression. Because depression can affect social behavior, including social competence (Bellack, Hersen, & Himmelhoch, 1981; Lewisohn, 1974; Marom, Gilhoa-Schechtman, Aderka, Weizman, & Hermesh, 2009), and is associated with QOL (Rapaport et al, 2005) we eliminated SP patients who had comorbid depression and reanalyzed the QOL data. In this study, statistically significant group differences on overall QOL remained the same even though none of the participants had a secondary diagnosis of depressive disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies did not find the type of social fears to differentiate between the two subtypes (e.g., Stein et al, 2000), supporting a dimensional structure (Furmark, Tillfors, Stattin, Ekselius, & Fredrikson, 2000;Kollman, Brown, Liverant, & Hofmann, 2006). Finally, some studies found the generalized subtype to be less responsive to treatment compared to the nongeneralized subtype (Brown et al, 1995), whereas others found it to be more responsive (Marom, Gilboa-Schechtman, Aderka, Weizman, & Hermesh, 2009) and still others have found no differences (Stein, Stein, Goodwin, Kumar, & Hunter, 2001; for a comprehensive review, see Hofmann et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%