Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
released from a pressure relieve valve (PRV) [1,2]. A PRV installed on pressurized equipment (labeled "Protected System" in Fig. 1) releases the overpressure gas or fluid from the equipment to the flare system [3]. The combination of PRVs and flare systems plays an essential role in preventing overpressure scenarios inside the piping and equipment [4,5]. An overpressure scenario is defined as a situation in which the internal pressure within the piping and vessel exceeds the maximum allowable working pressure. Overpressure scenarios in plants have severe negative and even catastrophic consequences, such as damage to the piping and equipment, loss of asset, fire and explosion [6], and could can the release of toxic and flammable chemicals into the atmosphere or marine environment [7].Piping makes up the major part of flaring systems and is used to transport gases and liquids inside the system. Unwanted gases (and sometimes liquids) released from pressurized facilities through PRVs are collected and gathered in flare subheader piping and eventually released to the flare header piping [8]. The entire piping system, including the flare subsystem, should be designed with precision and care. Different causes can contribute to piping failure, such as corrosion and poor material selection, stresses and loads, and poor piping design and selection. Material failure and corrosion are known as the major and most important cause of piping failure. The offshore environment is highly corrosive due to its chloride content, and the continual splash of seawater against offshore platforms can cause failure of the material used for components and facilities such as piping [9, 10]. Piping material failure, both in general and specifically for flare lines, has severe negative consequences, such as loss of asset; loss of production because of plant shutdown; the possibility of human loss of life, especially if the service contains hydrogen sulfide; and health, safety and environment (HSE) problems such as environmental Abstract Optimal operation of offshore plants depends on the correct material selection for offshore piping systems. Flare systems, in particular, play a critical role in the safety of personnel in the plant. This study aims to determine the most suitable material for flare piping in order to prevent such failures in the future. In order to select the optimum piping material for flare systems, a systematic material selection process, called value engineering (VE), in conjunction with initial screening has been selected. Flare piping materials are selected according to six criteria: internal and external corrosion resistance, mechanical strength, cost, low-temperature resistance and availability. Using the VE method, the weight factor is determined by comparing each parameter pair-wise. A score is then calculated for each parameter for each material. For the flare system, five different types of material candidates were assessed in terms of performance. As a result, Inconel 625 was found to be the most suitable material f...
released from a pressure relieve valve (PRV) [1,2]. A PRV installed on pressurized equipment (labeled "Protected System" in Fig. 1) releases the overpressure gas or fluid from the equipment to the flare system [3]. The combination of PRVs and flare systems plays an essential role in preventing overpressure scenarios inside the piping and equipment [4,5]. An overpressure scenario is defined as a situation in which the internal pressure within the piping and vessel exceeds the maximum allowable working pressure. Overpressure scenarios in plants have severe negative and even catastrophic consequences, such as damage to the piping and equipment, loss of asset, fire and explosion [6], and could can the release of toxic and flammable chemicals into the atmosphere or marine environment [7].Piping makes up the major part of flaring systems and is used to transport gases and liquids inside the system. Unwanted gases (and sometimes liquids) released from pressurized facilities through PRVs are collected and gathered in flare subheader piping and eventually released to the flare header piping [8]. The entire piping system, including the flare subsystem, should be designed with precision and care. Different causes can contribute to piping failure, such as corrosion and poor material selection, stresses and loads, and poor piping design and selection. Material failure and corrosion are known as the major and most important cause of piping failure. The offshore environment is highly corrosive due to its chloride content, and the continual splash of seawater against offshore platforms can cause failure of the material used for components and facilities such as piping [9, 10]. Piping material failure, both in general and specifically for flare lines, has severe negative consequences, such as loss of asset; loss of production because of plant shutdown; the possibility of human loss of life, especially if the service contains hydrogen sulfide; and health, safety and environment (HSE) problems such as environmental Abstract Optimal operation of offshore plants depends on the correct material selection for offshore piping systems. Flare systems, in particular, play a critical role in the safety of personnel in the plant. This study aims to determine the most suitable material for flare piping in order to prevent such failures in the future. In order to select the optimum piping material for flare systems, a systematic material selection process, called value engineering (VE), in conjunction with initial screening has been selected. Flare piping materials are selected according to six criteria: internal and external corrosion resistance, mechanical strength, cost, low-temperature resistance and availability. Using the VE method, the weight factor is determined by comparing each parameter pair-wise. A score is then calculated for each parameter for each material. For the flare system, five different types of material candidates were assessed in terms of performance. As a result, Inconel 625 was found to be the most suitable material f...
Offshore structures are highly susceptible to general corrosion which can lead to damage and lower the mechanical strength of the structure. Flare bridge structure are more susceptible to corrosion, due to experience combined effects of the corrosive marine environment and thermal radiation from flare. It is important to select a suitable coating system by considering the affected temperature. This paper will discuss about a brief case that describes how coating system selection is implemented in PHE ONWJ using a flare radiation simulation to estimate a maximum temperature. This study was started by reviewing previous Flare Heat Radiation and Dispersion Study in ‘U’ flow station to focus on flaring scenario, flare design data, and flare heat radiation contour. The next step is calculating the flare bridge temperature due to flare heat radiation exposure. This work combines four steps: (1) Collect flare bridge data, (2) Define maximum heat radiation based on flare contour, (3) Calculate the heat radiation received by flare bridge, (4) Calculate the flare bridge temperature. Lastly, select the coating system which considers the estimate of the flare bridge surface temperature and corrosion resistance to marine environment. The flare bridge temperature is estimated to be 136°C based on conservative calculation as affected by emergency flaring scenario that last(s) approximately 15 minutes of maximum flare relief duration. After the emergency flaring is over, the fluid service temperature slowly drops to the ambient temperature (approximately 28 to 30°C). This scenario is considered as the conservative approach due to the highest flow rate and maximum thermal radiation applied. Hence, apart from considerations to select an appropriate coating system such as: Minimum area average roughness, Sa 3; Prime coat functions as corrosion resistance in cyclic temperature; it should be considered that the coating temperature resistance > 136°C. Referring to the company's coating specification, we select BM 4-1 for coating the flare bridge structure. This practical approach aims to achieve as low as reasonably practicable coating system on the offshore flare bridge structure. Coating refurbishment using the selected coating system is expected to be highly suitable and can stand last for a long time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.