Impact of different antiretroviral therapy regimens on bone mineral density in people living with HIV: a retrospective and longitudinal study in China

Abstract

Background HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) are associated with bone loss of people living with HIV (PLWH), but limited studies exist on the impacts of ART regimens on bone mineral density (BMD) in China. This study evaluated BMD changes with three common ART regimens: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) + lamivudine (3TC) + efavirenz (EFV), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-containing, and dolutegravir (DTG)-containing (non-TDF/non-TAF) therapies. Methods In this retrospective study, the prevalence of low BMD was analyzed in PLWH who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) before ART initiation. BMD changes were assessed in participants who had follow-up DXA scans after ≥ 1 year of ART with TDF + 3TC + EFV, TAF-containing, or DTG-containing regimens. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the impact of different ART regimens on > 3% BMD reduction, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables that were significant in univariate analysis ( P < 0.10). Results 22.99% (630/2740) of PLWH before ART initiation had low BMD. Among 571 individuals followed up for over 1 year, BMD at the femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) decreased significantly in the TDF + 3TC + EFV [FN: -0.03(-0.07, 0.00) g/cm 2 , TH: -0.02(-0.05, 0.00) g/cm 2 , P < 0.001 for both] and TAF-containing regimens [FN: -0.02(-0.05, 0.01) g/cm 2 , TH: -0.02(-0.04, 0.01) g/cm 2 , P < 0.001 for both]. Lumbar spine (LS) BMD decreased significantly only with TDF + 3TC + EFV [-0.02(-0.05, 0.01) g/cm 2 , P < 0.001]. TDF + 3TC + EFV caused greater BMD loss at the FN and LS than the TAF-containing regimen[FN: -3.66% (-8.05%, 0.34%) vs. -2.38% (-5.44%, 1.12%), P = 0.044; LS: -2.11% (-4.50%, 0.62%) vs.-0.06% (-2.05%, 2.57%), P < 0.001]. Compared to TDF + 3TC + EFV, DTG-containing regimens showed smaller BMD reductions across all sites [FN: -1.49% (-4.65%, 3.83%), TH: 0.00% (-3.98%, 3.18%), LS: 0.59% (-2.73%, 3.09%), P = 0.004, 0.008 and 0.004, respectively]. TAF-containing and DTG-containing regimens showed no significant differences in BMD changes. Multivariable logistic regression showed that TDF + 3TC + EFV, compared to DTG-containing regimens, had higher odds of > 3% FN and LS BMD reduction (FN: OR 2.91, 95% CI: 1.33 to 6.37, P = 0.009; LS: OR 2.93, 95% CI: 1.17 to 7.32, P = 0.022), while TAF-containing regimens were not independently linked to > 3% BMD loss ( P > 0.05). Conclusions TAF-containing and DTG-containing regimens caused less bone loss than TDF + 3TC + EFV, offering safer options for preserving bone health in Chinese ...