2009
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of different chloride and glucose solutions on nasal potential difference

Abstract: The use of 0 mM chloride gives responses in the non-CF subjects, which are approximately 2 mV greater than protocols which use low (6 mM) chloride. Different glucose concentrations appear to exert little effect on baseline PD, suggesting that electrogenic glucose transport plays a limited role in airway transport at rest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences were highlighted as a cause of increased variability between sites in a multi‐center trial 12, so studies have now started to address specific details of the nasal PD. Boyle et al demonstrated that warmed solutions give larger isoproterenol responses 13, and we demonstrated that (0 mM) Cl gives significantly larger responses than (6 mM) Cl in non‐CF subjects, but glucose does not appear to alter nasal PD 14.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…These differences were highlighted as a cause of increased variability between sites in a multi‐center trial 12, so studies have now started to address specific details of the nasal PD. Boyle et al demonstrated that warmed solutions give larger isoproterenol responses 13, and we demonstrated that (0 mM) Cl gives significantly larger responses than (6 mM) Cl in non‐CF subjects, but glucose does not appear to alter nasal PD 14.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…This parallels the recent demonstration that low-chloride responses with 0 mM versus 6 mM Cl -solutions gave an extra 2 mV response [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Six centres of the ECFS-DN Working Group participated. The perfusate temperature was changed during each step of the NPD protocol, using a similar design to a recent study comparing different chloride concentrations in the perfusate [10]. In a separate series of studies, a standard protocol was performed with either warmed or room temperature solutions, in the same subjects on different days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%