2009
DOI: 10.1149/1.3090177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Different Electrolytes on Photocatalytic Water Splitting

Abstract: Despite extensive research in photocatalytic water splitting, electrolyte usage varies greatly across different photocells. Photocatalytic water splitting continues to be performed in a wide range of electrolytes, from very acidic to very basic, with incomplete understanding of how the electrolyte composition affects performance. This study provides guidelines for electrolyte selection in water splitting applications. To determine properties that comprise an ideal electrolyte for photocatalytic electrolysis, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29 mA/cm 2 at 1.6 V vs. RHE (1.35 V vs. Ag/AgCl) for the sample prepared with laser irradiating at 355 nm. These results are contradictory to other studies on different oxides (TiO 2 [50], ZnO [51], BiVO 4 [52]), where the photoelectrochemical performance increases with the pH value. Despite high instability of WO 3 in alkaline media [53], our WO 3 thin films show an excellent photoelectrochemical response, with no noticeable leakage currents or short circuits in the measured potential range.…”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Measurementscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…29 mA/cm 2 at 1.6 V vs. RHE (1.35 V vs. Ag/AgCl) for the sample prepared with laser irradiating at 355 nm. These results are contradictory to other studies on different oxides (TiO 2 [50], ZnO [51], BiVO 4 [52]), where the photoelectrochemical performance increases with the pH value. Despite high instability of WO 3 in alkaline media [53], our WO 3 thin films show an excellent photoelectrochemical response, with no noticeable leakage currents or short circuits in the measured potential range.…”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Measurementscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that a higher pH value is more favorable for photoelectrochemical oxidation of water. Firstly, there will be a higher electrical conductivity of the electrolyte, which reduces ohmic losses, and secondly, the surface of the semiconductor will be completely covered by adsorbed hydroxide ions, which trap holes more efficiently than adsorbed water . Nevertheless, these experiments suggest that the hole accumulation at the SS‐LTON/CoO x is greatly reduced in comparison to the bare electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At low pH, namely using acid KCl aqueous solution as the electrolyte, the proposed H + reduction reaction at cathode (Cu 3 VSe 4 NSs-FTO thin film) is , which consumes hydrogen ions; whereas, at high pH (pH = 10), the reaction at cathode consumes water rather than H + , being 48 , 49 . The consumption of water takes place via an extra water dissociation , thus, the process of photocatalytic reduction is naturally slowed at higher pHs 50 , in turn, the larger amount of H + present at acid pH facilitates the H 2 production. Besides, at pH of 4, the surface of Cu 3 VSe 4 NSs-FTO thin film is positively charged by adsorbing H + , facilitating the reduction reaction, whereas, at higher pH (pH of 7 and 10) the electrode/electrolyte interface is neutral or negatively charged, which eliminates the electrostatic interaction, or even creates a strong electrostatic repulsion towards Cl − that results in a lower hole capture rate and in a low production of hydrogen 51 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%