2013
DOI: 10.1111/adj.12016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of different fluoride concentrations and pH of dentifrices on tooth erosion/abrasion in vitro

Abstract: Background: This in vitro study analysed the effect of different fluoride concentrations in acidic or neutral liquid dentifrices in protecting enamel and dentine from erosive and abrasive wear. Methods: Bovine enamel and dentine specimens (n = 132) were randomly allocated to 11 groups (each n = 12): experimental liquid dentifrices with 550 ppm F, 1100 ppm F, 5000 ppm F or 0 ppm F/placebo (each at pH 4.5 and pH 7.0); and commercial dentifrices with 550 ppm F (Colgate Baby, pH 7.0), 1100 ppm F (Crest, pH 7.0) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…33 The present model is a proof of concept for profilometric detection of early erosion and is an advance in profilometric assessment for several reasons: (1) A higher sensitivity of the profilometer in this study enabled earlier changes in surface roughness (i.e. after 30 s of erosion) to be detected compared with the longer durations described previously, [21][22][23][34][35][36] (2) Enamel specimens were polished flat to a level of 0.25 mm compared with approximately less than 9.0 mm in recent atomic force microscopic studies, or to 1.0 mm in surface nanohardness studies, 23,37,38 (3) The longitudinal design incorporated both quantitative and qualitative assessments (without the need for surface coating or negative impressions for qualitative assessment), (4) 3D surface roughness (Sa) was measured over areas of 43 mm  43 mm compared with linear measurements in previous studies, 34,39 and (5) The Sa values were collected longitudinally from the same areas of enamel. Our detection sensitivity for profilometric changes in the Sa values is comparable to those of between one and two minutes in recent reports, [39][40][41][42] and, collectively, these findings add to the need to diagnose the initial stages of early erosion as soon as possible in the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The present model is a proof of concept for profilometric detection of early erosion and is an advance in profilometric assessment for several reasons: (1) A higher sensitivity of the profilometer in this study enabled earlier changes in surface roughness (i.e. after 30 s of erosion) to be detected compared with the longer durations described previously, [21][22][23][34][35][36] (2) Enamel specimens were polished flat to a level of 0.25 mm compared with approximately less than 9.0 mm in recent atomic force microscopic studies, or to 1.0 mm in surface nanohardness studies, 23,37,38 (3) The longitudinal design incorporated both quantitative and qualitative assessments (without the need for surface coating or negative impressions for qualitative assessment), (4) 3D surface roughness (Sa) was measured over areas of 43 mm  43 mm compared with linear measurements in previous studies, 34,39 and (5) The Sa values were collected longitudinally from the same areas of enamel. Our detection sensitivity for profilometric changes in the Sa values is comparable to those of between one and two minutes in recent reports, [39][40][41][42] and, collectively, these findings add to the need to diagnose the initial stages of early erosion as soon as possible in the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of protective agents in toothpastes has become increasingly common; also because dental sensitivity, a problem often related to acid erosion, is a common complaint among patients. Currently, conventional fluoridebased toothpastes do not seem to be able to effectively protect teeth against erosion (5). Recently, new toothpastes formulations have been introduced to contrast enamel and dentin erosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluoride dentifrices have some protective effect on enamel eroded to brushing abrasion when immersed in vitro in a cola drink (8). Currently, conventional fluoridecontaining toothpastes do not appear to be able to protect efficiently against erosion (9). Colgate Sensitive Pro Relief (Colgate-Palmolive, New York, NY, USA) is based on arginine 8% (Pro-Argin ™ ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%