2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2005.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of distributed generation on distribution investment deferral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth that this benefit has a strong dependence on the utility's cost structure, planning projects and infrastructure. In [37] it is shown that low density of microgeneration has a greater positive impact on this benefit. This is thanks to the complementarity between production patterns, which increase energy availability.…”
Section: Investment Deferralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth that this benefit has a strong dependence on the utility's cost structure, planning projects and infrastructure. In [37] it is shown that low density of microgeneration has a greater positive impact on this benefit. This is thanks to the complementarity between production patterns, which increase energy availability.…”
Section: Investment Deferralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential benefits of DG include: reduction of power losses, improvement in the voltage profile, deferred network expansion cost, network reliability improvement, etc. [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For optimal allocation of DG in distribution networks, different objectives such as power loss minimization [6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], improvement of voltage profile [6,13,23,26], network investment cost minimization [4,9,10], reduction of environmental impact [6], etc. were proposed by researchers using single or multi objective problem formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the distributed generation approach has several benefits over the others, such as: 1) reduction of transmission and distribution costs: about the 30% of the costs related to electricity supply relates to these costs. Local connections do not generate high capital costs and energy losses for long distances to be wired with overhead facilities; 2) decrease of energy dissipation: piping and conversion devices dissipate almost 6% of produced energy, [4] increasing costs and emissions; in a smart grid, these kinds of losses are avoided; 3) increase of energy efficiency: the simultaneous supply of electrical and thermal demand allow to reduce energy waste, improving system global efficiency; since thermal energy is less easily transported than electricity, distributed generation approach (production close to users) is essential. Because of mentioned benefits deregulation has evolved in all three sectors of the power system (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a number of recent publications [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], it can be seen that in a deregulated power system, each individual distribution company may wish to determine the costs and benefits of DG planning under different circumstances. It is difficult to find a single planning method that satisfies all objectives simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%