2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81806-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of domestic travel restrictions on transmission of COVID-19 infection using public transportation network approach

Abstract: The international spread of COVID-19 infection has attracted global attention, but the impact of local or domestic travel restriction on public transportation network remains unclear. Passenger volume data for the domestic public transportation network in Japan and the time at which the first confirmed COVID-19 case was observed in each prefecture were extracted from public data sources. A survival approach in which a hazard was modeled as a function of the closeness centrality on the network was utilized to e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are a limited number of studies reporting the effects of domestic travel restrictions on the virus spread. A recently published report by Murano et al, quantifying the effect of domestic travel restrictions and COVID-19 spread in Japan, provides interesting insights into the transmission dynamics of other respiratory infections, including HRSV [ 65 ]. Specifically, transmission dynamics varied in the degree of reduction in the number of passengers and the centrality of each prefecture in the public transport network (e.g., car, train, ship, airline network), assuming that traffic restrictions were in place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are a limited number of studies reporting the effects of domestic travel restrictions on the virus spread. A recently published report by Murano et al, quantifying the effect of domestic travel restrictions and COVID-19 spread in Japan, provides interesting insights into the transmission dynamics of other respiratory infections, including HRSV [ 65 ]. Specifically, transmission dynamics varied in the degree of reduction in the number of passengers and the centrality of each prefecture in the public transport network (e.g., car, train, ship, airline network), assuming that traffic restrictions were in place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During COVID-19, domestic travel restrictions are increasingly recognized as an important means of controlling spread of the coronavirus [ 75 ]. Cross-border health measures have been extensively used to control movements across internal or domestic (subnational jurisdictions) borders.…”
Section: Results: Categorizing Cross-border Health Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposing to a higher concentration of NO 2 also lead to respiratory functionality damage, including decreased levels in lung volume and expiratory flow (14). Given that the impact of transportation restriction on ambient NO 2 and COVID-19 transmissibility have been well understood (15,16), we speculate that the statistical association between ambient NO 2 and COVID-19 transmissibility obtained from previous evidences may be undermined without considering the effect of transportation restriction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the hypothesized mediation framework, we considered transportation restriction, ambient NO 2 , and COVID-19 transmissibility as the independent variable, mediator, and the dependent variable, respectively. The assumption is based on the well-studied evidence that (i) transportation restriction causes a reduction in ambient NO 2 ( 3 ) and (ii) transportation restriction may also reduce the transmissibility of COVID-19 ( 15 , 16 ). According to the mediation framework by the classic requirements of Baron and Kennys ( 27 ), NO 2 would be a mediator to explain the relationship between transportation restriction and COVID-19 transmissibility if the hypothesis yielded in Scenario 1 was true.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%