2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00149-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of dominant tree dynamics on site index curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
48
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
48
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mortality rates for black spruce and jack pine in this study are in line with those of Raulier et al (2003) who estimated the ten-year mortality rates of dominant trees for black spruce and jack pine at 8.0% and 2.6%, respectively. Overall, our results did not show clear evidence of lower mortality rates for top height trees using data from permanent sample plots covering tree species of different shade tolerances growing in Québec.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The mortality rates for black spruce and jack pine in this study are in line with those of Raulier et al (2003) who estimated the ten-year mortality rates of dominant trees for black spruce and jack pine at 8.0% and 2.6%, respectively. Overall, our results did not show clear evidence of lower mortality rates for top height trees using data from permanent sample plots covering tree species of different shade tolerances growing in Québec.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Growth may be affected by many aspects of the microclimate: sunshine, precipitation, temperature, wind speed and humidity , Ung et al 2001. There are also non-climatic factors that may exert an influence, such as competition, defoliators, soil nutrient availability, the location of the tree, the age of the tree and many other variables (Beaumont et al 1999, Raulier et al 2003. Growing concern about global climate change (Houghton 1997, Houghton et al 2001 has put greater urgency on understanding the relationship between climate and important management factors such as site productivity, a key component in growth and yield prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as this value is similar to the 14% value obtained by Magnussen and Penner (1996) in a stand near Grande Prairie, Alberta, there is evidence it is a reasonable juvenile top height bias estimate for white spruce in Alberta mixedwoods. Ideally, a site curve fit to permanent sample plot (PSP) data would eliminate the need for this correction, by providing a direct estimate of the true top height -age trajectory (Raulier et al 2003). However, as Alberta lacks re-measured PSP data at the mid-rotation age classes, such a correction is currently necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since these techniques are often calibrated using retrospective stem analysis data (Huang 1996(Huang , 1997Nigh and Martin 2001), they may be subject to a bias (Raulier et al 2003). Shifts in the size rank of the larger trees over the lifetime of a stand (Tiarks et al 1998) will cause bias in the site index if the stand is not sampled when the top height trees are at the base age (Dahms 1963, Magnussen andPenner 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%