Monitoring data contributes to environmental risk and impact assessments, baseline studies and operational monitoring and is important to the environmental management of offshore Exploration & Production (E&P) activities. The quality of such studies may, in principle, be limited to the quality of data. In recent years, there have been several new methods in development which aim to supplement and/or replace conventionally used monitored data sources. These new methods have become available in a time of many key changes which affect the marine monitoring, such as increased regulatory and stakeholder expectations and activities occurring in more sensitive and remote areas.In this study, an analysis of the concurrent application of five monitoring methods is presented on an E&P site where historical environmental data are available. Foraminiferal assessment, biomarkers, passive samplers and ecotoxicology were all compared to conventional benthos analysis. The objective was to evaluate the added value of new monitoring methods in advance of future validation in extreme environments such as arctic and deep seas.Evaluation of the various methods was performed and presented with the advantages and limiting factors. Results show that non-conventional methods may provide advantages in terms of analytical abilities, cost effectiveness, spatial and temporal coverage and geographic applicability. Specifically, passive samplers report hydrocarbon concentrations at very low limits of detection and foraminiferal diversity was shown to provide historical information when baseline data is unavailable. These new monitoring methods offer improvements over conventional methods which have been in use for decades and may offer environmental managers rigorous and useful alternatives to conventional analysis.