2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.103.214204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of drive harmonics on the stability of Floquet many-body localization

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One pivotal method in realizing the dynamical synthetic gauge field lies in driving quantum systems periodically, which is also known as Floquet engineering. [ 1–9 ] The discrete time translational symmetry in Floquet engineering signifies that the systems periodically exchange energy (or particles) with the external driving field, and hence there exist no well defined ground states. In consequence, in contrast to the static cases, the topological characterizations of periodically driven systems are based on the Floquet evolving operator Ufalse(Tfalse)$U(T)$, of which the diagonalization may give birth to not only zero quasi‐energy edge modes, but also the Floquet edge modes pinned at quasi‐energy ±ω2$\pm \frac{\omega }{2}$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One pivotal method in realizing the dynamical synthetic gauge field lies in driving quantum systems periodically, which is also known as Floquet engineering. [ 1–9 ] The discrete time translational symmetry in Floquet engineering signifies that the systems periodically exchange energy (or particles) with the external driving field, and hence there exist no well defined ground states. In consequence, in contrast to the static cases, the topological characterizations of periodically driven systems are based on the Floquet evolving operator Ufalse(Tfalse)$U(T)$, of which the diagonalization may give birth to not only zero quasi‐energy edge modes, but also the Floquet edge modes pinned at quasi‐energy ±ω2$\pm \frac{\omega }{2}$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%