2015
DOI: 10.15287/afr.2015.364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of drought and stand edge on mycorrhizal density on the fine roots of Norway spruce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dry mass of roots with diameter up to 1 mm in this study was not significantly influenced by drought stress. It is congruent with study on 80 years old spruces in the first and the second year with the same experimental design (Pešková et al, 2015) and in roots with diameter up to 2 mm on 140 years old spruces after six weeks of water exclusion induced by shelters (Gaul et al, 2008). On the other hand, the influence of drought on root weight has been observed to be negative in roots with diameter up to 1 mm in spruces 12 years old in all four years of the experiment (Palátová, 2004), in roots with diameter up to 2 mm in trees 5 years old, exposed to 11-year reduced watering in greenhouse (Eldhuset et al, 2013) and in young spruce stands in natural conditions, monitored for four years (Konôpka et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dry mass of roots with diameter up to 1 mm in this study was not significantly influenced by drought stress. It is congruent with study on 80 years old spruces in the first and the second year with the same experimental design (Pešková et al, 2015) and in roots with diameter up to 2 mm on 140 years old spruces after six weeks of water exclusion induced by shelters (Gaul et al, 2008). On the other hand, the influence of drought on root weight has been observed to be negative in roots with diameter up to 1 mm in spruces 12 years old in all four years of the experiment (Palátová, 2004), in roots with diameter up to 2 mm in trees 5 years old, exposed to 11-year reduced watering in greenhouse (Eldhuset et al, 2013) and in young spruce stands in natural conditions, monitored for four years (Konôpka et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The effect of drought on mycorrhizal colonization within Norway spruce stands (including our study) was not so apparent. On 80-yearsold spruces drought induced by shelters significantly reduced the density of active mycorrhizae, but not the density of nonactive mycorrhizae neither proportion of active mycorrhizae (Pešková et al, 2015). In two 12 years-old spruce stands drought induced by shelters (approx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The global climate change concept expects the occurrence of weather extremes that will limit the life in the regions. So, a drought is supposed to be the most important stress factor influencing forests as well (Hlásny et al 2014;Pešková et al 2015). However, forests in Central Europe resist the drought as a prime damaging agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short and medium term effects are the reduction of photosynthesis, nutritional disequilibria, having as result the loss of the crown. At stem level, xylophagous insects and fungi, extreme heat or frost generate disturbances of metabolism and conductivity, reduce primary resistance and cause diminutions of the rhythm of cambial activity, while at rootlet system level, draughts, stagnant water, acidification, nutritional disequilibria, pathogenic fungi and bacteria, which most often cause problems of assimilation or even the reduction / complete stop of symbiotic relationships (Gibbs and Greig, 1997;Csóka et al, 1999;Hilszczański and Sierpinski, 2006;Fodor et al, 2011;Pešková et al, 2015;Vuts et al, 2016;Denman et al, 2017).…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%